Achieving Equilibrium under Utility Heterogeneity: An Agent-Attention Framework for Multi-Agent Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent multi-objective systems (MAMOS) have emerged as powerful frameworks for modelling complex decision-making problems across various real-world domains, such as robotic exploration, autonomous traffic management, and sensor network optimisation. MAMOS offers enhanced scalability and robustness through decentralised control and more accurately reflects inherent trade-offs between conflicting objectives. In MAMOS, each agent uses utility functions that map return vectors to scalar values. Existing MAMOS optimisation methods face challenges in handling heterogeneous objective and utility function settings, where training non-stationarity is intensified due to private utility functions and the associated policies. In this paper, we first theoretically prove that direct access to, or structured modeling of, global utility functions is necessary for the Bayesian Nash Equilibrium under decentralised execution constraints. To access the global utility functions while preserving the decentralised execution, we propose an Agent-Attention Multi-Agent Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning (AA-MAMORL) framework. Our approach implicitly learns a joint belief over other agents' utility functions and their associated policies during centralised training, effectively mapping global states and utilities to each agent's policy. In execution, each agent independently selects actions based on local observations and its private utility function to approximate a BNE, without relying on inter-agent communication. We conduct comprehensive experiments in both a custom-designed MAMO Particle environment and the standard MOMALand benchmark. The results demonstrate that access to global preferences and our proposed AA-MAMORL significantly improve performance and consistently outperform state-of-the-art methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026A Multi-Agent system for Multi-Objective constrained optimization
- 2026Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Agent-Specific Preference
- 2024Equilibrium Selection for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning: A Unified Framework
- 2024Game Theory and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning : From Nash Equilibria to Evolutionary Dynamics
- 2025LOD: Latent Objective Discovery in Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Sampling-Based Coordination-Informed Multi-Objective Multi-Robot Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Learning and Calibrating Heterogeneous Bounded Rational Market Behaviour with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Divide and Conquer: Provably Unveiling the Pareto Front with Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning