mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpretable by Design: Query-Specific Neural Modules for Explainable Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2511.08749 ↗First posted 11 Nov 2025cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Interpretable and logic-guided RL

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning has traditionally focused on a singular objective: learning policies that select actions to maximize reward. We challenge this paradigm by asking: what if we explicitly architected RL systems as inference engines that can answer diverse queries about their environment? In deterministic settings, trained agents implicitly encode rich knowledge about reachability, distances, values, and dynamics - yet current architectures are not designed to expose this information efficiently. We introduce Query Conditioned Deterministic Inference Networks (QDIN), a unified architecture that treats different types of queries (policy, reachability, paths, comparisons) as first-class citizens, with specialized neural modules optimized for each inference pattern. Our key empirical finding reveals a fundamental decoupling: inference accuracy can reach near-perfect levels (99% reachability IoU) even when control performance remains suboptimal (31% return), suggesting that the representations needed for accurate world knowledge differ from those required for optimal control. Experiments demonstrate that query specialized architectures outperform both unified models and post-hoc extraction methods, while maintaining competitive control performance. This work establishes a research agenda for RL systems designed from inception as queryable knowledge bases, with implications for interpretability, verification, and human-AI collaboration.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Interpretable and logic-guided RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Base Rollouts to RL Reasoning: A Budgeted Search Perspective
  2. 2026From Black Box to Executable Logic: Explainable Reinforcement Learning through Prolog Expert Systems
  3. 2025Whatever Remains Must Be True: Filtering Drives Reasoning in LLMs, Shaping Diversity
  4. 2024Towards a Research Community in Interpretable Reinforcement Learning: the InterpPol Workshop
  5. 2025Explainable Reinforcement Learning via Temporal Policy Decomposition
  6. 2025From Explainability to Interpretability: Interpretable Policies in Reinforcement Learning Via Model Explanation
  7. 2025RECON: Reasoning with Condensation for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  8. 2025Inducing, Detecting and Characterising Neural Modules: A Pipeline for Functional Interpretability in Reinforcement Learning