mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Energy Consumption of Dataframe Libraries for End-to-End Deep Learning Pipelines:A Comparative Analysis

arXiv 2511.08644 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2025cs.SE cs.AI cs.PFcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a detailed comparative analysis of the performance of three major Python data manipulation libraries - Pandas, Polars, and Dask - specifically when embedded within complete deep learning (DL) training and inference pipelines. The research bridges a gap in existing literature by studying how these libraries interact with substantial GPU workloads during critical phases like data loading, preprocessing, and batch feeding. The authors measured key performance indicators including runtime, memory usage, disk usage, and energy consumption (both CPU and GPU) across various machine learning models and datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2025.

Builds on

4 of 20 references.

References · 4

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 648
  3. 2022Contemporary Recommendation Systems on Big Data and Their Applications: A Surveycited by 5
  4. 2023Evaluation of Dataframe Libraries for Data Preparation on a Single Machinecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.