mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Impact of Longitudinal Mammogram Alignment on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment

arXiv 2511.08328 ↗First posted 11 Nov 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Regular mammography screening is crucial for early breast cancer detection. By leveraging deep learning-based risk models, screening intervals can be personalized, especially for high-risk individuals. While recent methods increasingly incorporate longitudinal information from prior mammograms, accurate spatial alignment across time points remains a key challenge. Misalignment can obscure meaningful tissue changes and degrade model performance. In this study, we provide insights into various alignment strategies, image-based registration, feature-level (representation space) alignment with and without regularization, and implicit alignment methods, for their effectiveness in longitudinal deep learning-based risk modeling. Using two large-scale mammography datasets, we assess each method across key metrics, including predictive accuracy, precision, recall, and deformation field quality. Our results show that image-based registration consistently outperforms the more recently favored feature-based and implicit approaches across all metrics, enabling more accurate, temporally consistent predictions and generating smooth, anatomically plausible deformation fields. Although regularizing the deformation field improves deformation quality, it reduces the risk prediction performance of feature-level alignment. Applying image-based deformation fields within the feature space yields the best risk prediction performance. These findings underscore the importance of image-based deformation fields for spatial alignment in longitudinal risk modeling, offering improved prediction accuracy and robustness. This approach has strong potential to enhance personalized screening and enable earlier interventions for high-risk individuals. The code is available at https://github.com/sot176/Mammogram_Alignment_Study_Risk_Prediction.git, allowing full reproducibility of the results.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.

Builds on

13 of 49 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  6. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  7. 2018VoxelMorph: A Learning Framework for Deformable Medical Image Registrationcited by 662
  8. 2023A survey on deep learning in medical image registration: new technologies, uncertainty, evaluation metrics, and beyondcited by 55
  9. 2023Enhancing Breast Cancer Risk Prediction by Incorporating Prior Imagescited by 15
  10. 2022Time-distance vision transformers in lung cancer diagnosis from longitudinal computed tomographycited by 9
  11. 2024Longitudinal Mammogram Risk Predictioncited by 8
  12. 2024Ordinal Learning: Longitudinal Attention Alignment Model for Predicting Time to Future Breast Cancer Events from Mammogramscited by 7
1 more
  1. 2025Reconsidering Explicit Longitudinal Mammography Alignment for Enhanced Breast Cancer Risk Predictioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.