Prudential Reliability of Large Language Models in Reinsurance: Governance, Assurance, and Capital Efficiency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper develops a prudential framework for assessing the reliability of large language models (LLMs) in reinsurance. A five-pillar architecture--governance, data lineage, assurance, resilience, and regulatory alignment--translates supervisory expectations from Solvency II, SR 11-7, and guidance from EIOPA (2025), NAIC (2023), and IAIS (2024) into measurable lifecycle controls. The framework is implemented through the Reinsurance AI Reliability and Assurance Benchmark (RAIRAB), which evaluates whether governance-embedded LLMs meet prudential standards for grounding, transparency, and accountability. Across six task families, retrieval-grounded configurations achieved higher grounding accuracy (0.90), reduced hallucination and interpretive drift by roughly 40%, and nearly doubled transparency. These mechanisms lower informational frictions in risk transfer and capital allocation, showing that existing prudential doctrines already accommodate reliable AI when governance is explicit, data are traceable, and assurance is verifiable.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.
Builds on
2 of 56 references.
References · 2
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
Built on by
Not cited yet.