Bilevel Learning via Inexact Stochastic Gradient Descent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bilevel optimization is a central tool in machine learning for high-dimensional hyperparameter tuning. Its applications are vast; for instance, in imaging it can be used for learning data-adaptive regularizers and optimizing forward operators in variational regularization. These problems are large in many ways: a lot of data is usually available to train a large number of parameters, calling for stochastic gradient-based algorithms. However, exact gradients with respect to parameters (so-called hypergradients) are not available, and their precision is usually linearly related to computational cost. Hence, algorithms must solve the problem efficiently without unnecessary precision. The design of such methods is still not fully understood, especially regarding how accuracy requirements and step size schedules affect theoretical guarantees and practical performance. Existing approaches introduce stochasticity at both the upper level (e.g., in sampling or mini-batch estimates) and the lower level (e.g., in solving the inner problem) to improve generalization, but they typically fix the number of lower-level iterations, which conflicts with asymptotic convergence assumptions. In this work, we advance the theory of inexact stochastic bilevel optimization. We prove convergence and establish rates under decaying accuracy and step size schedules, showing that with optimal configurations convergence occurs at an O(k-1/4) rate in expectation. Experiments on image denoising and inpainting with convex ridge regularizers and input-convex networks confirm our analysis: decreasing step sizes improve stability, accuracy scheduling is more critical than step size strategy, and adaptive preconditioning (e.g., Adam) further boosts performance. These results bridge theory and practice, providing convergence guarantees and practical guidance for large-scale imaging problems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2025.
Builds on
38 of 50 references.
References · 38
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
- 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 414
- 2015Gradient-based Hyperparameter Optimization through Reversible Learningcited by 360
- 2016Hyperparameter optimization with approximate gradientcited by 233
- 2019SGD: General Analysis and Improved Ratescited by 207
- 2018Truncated Back-propagation for Bilevel Optimizationcited by 190
- 2020Better Theory for SGD in the Nonconvex Worldcited by 158
- 2020On the Iteration Complexity of Hypergradient Computationcited by 155
- 2021A Near-Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic Bilevel Optimization via Double-Momentumcited by 106
- 2021JFB: Jacobian-Free Backpropagation for Implicit Networkscited by 86
- 2021Unbiased Gradient Estimation in Unrolled Computation Graphs with Persistent Evolution Strategiescited by 52
26 more
- 2022A Neural-Network-Based Convex Regularizer for Inverse Problemscited by 41
- 2023A Guide Through the Zoo of Biased SGDcited by 40
- 2023Learning Weakly Convex Regularizers for Convergent Image-Reconstruction Algorithmscited by 31
- 2023One-step differentiation of iterative algorithmscited by 28
- 2021Meta-Learning to Improve Pre-Trainingcited by 27
- 2021SHINE: SHaring the INverse Estimate from the forward pass for bi-level optimization and implicit modelscited by 26
- 2022Automatic differentiation of nonsmooth iterative algorithmscited by 25
- 2019Learning the Sampling Pattern for MRIcited by 21
- 2014Insights into analysis operator learning: From patch-based sparse models to higher-order MRFscited by 18
- 2019Automatic Differentiation of Some First-Order Methods in Parametric Optimizationcited by 18
- 2016Techniques for Gradient Based Bilevel Optimization with Nonsmooth Lower Level Problemscited by 12
- 2023Analyzing Inexact Hypergradients for Bilevel Learningcited by 8
- 2020Inexact Derivative-Free Optimization for Bilevel Learningcited by 7
- 2022Linearly convergent bilevel optimization with single-step inner methodscited by 7
- 2025Deep Equilibrium models for Poisson Imaging Inverse problems via Mirror Descentcited by 7
- 2023An adaptively inexact first-order method for bilevel optimization with application to hyperparameter learningcited by 4
- 2022A simplified convergence theory for Byzantine resilient stochastic gradient descentcited by 3
- 2025TomoSelfDEQ: Self-Supervised Deep Equilibrium Learning for Sparse-Angle CT Reconstructioncited by 3
- 2024Nonsmooth Implicit Differentiation: Deterministic and Stochastic Convergence Ratescited by 2
- 2024Single-loop methods for bilevel parameter learning in inverse imagingcited by 2
- 2024Differential estimates for fast first-order multilevel nonconvex optimisationcited by 2
- 2024An Adaptively Inexact Method for Bilevel Learning Using Primal-Dual Style Differentiationcited by 2
- 2024Bilevel Learning with Inexact Stochastic Gradientscited by 2
- 2025Restarted contractive operators to learn at equilibriumcited by 2
- 2024Efficient gradient-based methods for bilevel learning via recycling Krylov subspacescited by 1
- 2025Fast Inexact Bilevel Optimization for Analytical Deep Image Priorscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.