mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Uncertainty Quantification in Turbulence Models

arXiv 2511.05633 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2025cs.LG physics.flu-dyncited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Predicting the evolution of turbulent flows is central across science and engineering. Most studies rely on simulations with turbulence models, whose empirical simplifications introduce epistemic uncertainty. The Eigenspace Perturbation Method (EPM) is a widely used physics-based approach to quantify model-form uncertainty, but being purely physics-based it can overpredict uncertainty bounds. We propose a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based modulation of EPM perturbation magnitudes to improve calibration while preserving physical consistency. Across canonical cases, the hybrid ML-EPM framework yields substantially tighter, better-calibrated uncertainty estimates than baseline EPM alone.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2025.

Builds on

5 of 44 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 385
  2. 2023Physics Constrained Unsupervised Deep Learning for Rapid, High Resolution Scanning Coherent Diffraction Reconstructioncited by 13
  3. 2020Data-assisted combustion simulations with dynamic submodel assignment using random forestscited by 7
  4. 2021Interpretable Data-driven Methods for Subgrid-scale Closure in LES for Transcritical LOX/GCH4 Combustioncited by 6
  5. 2022Evaluation of physics constrained data-driven methods for turbulence model uncertainty quantificationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.