DARN: Dynamic Adaptive Regularization Networks for Efficient and Robust Foundation Model Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models (FMs) offer powerful representations for geospatial analysis, but adapting them effectively remains challenging. Standard adaptation methods, whether full fine-tuning or efficient frozen-backbone approaches, typically employ decoders with fixed regularization strategies, failing to account for the significant heterogeneity in satellite imagery. We introduce Dynamic Adaptive Regularization Networks (DARN), a novel decoder architecture designed to address this limitation. DARN integrates three key innovations: (1) a lightweight Task Complexity Predictor (TCP) that estimates per-sample difficulty, (2) Adaptive Dropout Modulation (ADM), dynamically adjusting dropout rates (from 0.1 to 0.5) based on predicted complexity, and (3) Dynamic Capacity Gating (DCG) that modulates channel activation. We provide theoretical justifications linking DARN's optimization to stationary point convergence and its mechanism to adaptive information bottlenecks. Empirically, DARN demonstrates exceptional performance across both major adaptation paradigms. In full fine-tuning (unfrozen backbone), DARN achieves a new state-of-the-art on the multi-task GeoBench benchmark (86.66% mIoU, +5.56 pp over prior SOTA). In efficient adaptation (frozen backbone), DARN achieves SOTA-competitive accuracy (90.5% mIoU on Sen1Floods11) while delivering substantial advantages crucial for real-world deployment: superior out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization (+9.5 pp mIoU on AI4SmallFarms), enhanced robustness (17% relative reduction in corruption error), and improved performance on minority classes. DARN offers a more intelligent, robust, and efficient approach to leveraging FMs in critical geospatial applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2025.
Builds on
17 of 31 references.
References · 17
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,472
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2018Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understandingcited by 1,265
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
- 2019Dynamic Convolution: Attention over Convolution Kernelscited by 355
5 more
- 2018DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networkscited by 261
- 2017Concrete Dropoutcited by 227
- 2023Foundation Models for Generalist Geospatial Artificial Intelligencecited by 143
- 2013Dropout Training as Adaptive Regularizationcited by 89
- 2018Multi-Temporal Land Cover Classification with Sequential Recurrent Encoderscited by 61
Built on by
Not cited yet.