When retrieval outperforms generation: Dense evidence retrieval for scalable fake news detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The proliferation of misinformation necessitates robust yet computationally efficient fact verification systems. While current state-of-the-art approaches leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating explanatory rationales, these methods face significant computational barriers and hallucination risks in real-world deployments. We present DeReC (Dense Retrieval Classification), a lightweight framework that demonstrates how general-purpose text embeddings can effectively replace autoregressive LLM-based approaches in fact verification tasks. By combining dense retrieval with specialized classification, our system achieves better accuracy while being significantly more efficient. DeReC outperforms explanation-generating LLMs in efficiency, reducing runtime by 95% on RAWFC (23 minutes 36 seconds compared to 454 minutes 12 seconds) and by 92% on LIAR-RAW (134 minutes 14 seconds compared to 1692 minutes 23 seconds), showcasing its effectiveness across varying dataset sizes. On the RAWFC dataset, DeReC achieves an F1 score of 65.58%, surpassing the state-of-the-art method L-Defense (61.20%). Our results demonstrate that carefully engineered retrieval-based systems can match or exceed LLM performance in specialized tasks while being significantly more practical for real-world deployment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2025.
Builds on
25 of 37 references.
References · 25
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
- 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
- 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 705
- 2021A Survey on Automated Fact-Checkingcited by 376
- 2024Nomic Embed: Training a Reproducible Long Context Text Embeddercited by 255
- 2024MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documentscited by 251
- 2020Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claimscited by 209
- 2023RA-DIT: Retrieval-Augmented Dual Instruction Tuningcited by 194
13 more
- 2023LLM Lies: Hallucinations are not Bugs, but Features as Adversarial Examplescited by 177
- 2020Generating Fact Checking Explanationscited by 132
- 2018DeClarE: Debunking Fake News and False Claims using Evidence-Aware Deep Learningcited by 100
- 2023Towards LLM-based Fact Verification on News Claims with a Hierarchical Step-by-Step Prompting Methodcited by 97
- 2020Explainable Automated Fact-Checking: A Surveycited by 83
- 2024Making Text Embedders Few-Shot Learnerscited by 78
- 2023Llama2Vec: Unsupervised Adaptation of Large Language Models for Dense Retrievalcited by 77
- 2024Generate-then-Ground in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 51
- 2024Explainable Fake News Detection With Large Language Model via Defense Among Competing Wisdomcited by 49
- 2023FactLLaMA: Optimizing Instruction-Following Language Models with External Knowledge for Automated Fact-Checkingcited by 37
- 2023FactCHD: Benchmarking Fact-Conflicting Hallucination Detectioncited by 29
- 2024Retrieval Augmented Fact Verification by Synthesizing Contrastive Argumentscited by 25
- 2018TI-CNN: Convolutional Neural Networks for Fake News Detectioncited by 22
Built on by
Not cited yet.