Uncertainties in Physics-informed Inverse Problems: The Hidden Risk in Scientific AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) integrates partial differential equations (PDEs) into machine learning models to solve inverse problems, such as estimating coefficient functions (e.g., the Hamiltonian function) that characterize physical systems. This framework enables data-driven understanding and prediction of complex physical phenomena. While coefficient functions in PIML are typically estimated on the basis of predictive performance, physics as a discipline does not rely solely on prediction accuracy to evaluate models. For example, Kepler's heliocentric model was favored owing to small discrepancies in planetary motion, despite its similar predictive accuracy to the geocentric model. This highlights the inherent uncertainties in data-driven model inference and the scientific importance of selecting physically meaningful solutions. In this paper, we propose a framework to quantify and analyze such uncertainties in the estimation of coefficient functions in PIML. We apply our framework to reduced model of magnetohydrodynamics and our framework shows that there are uncertainties, and unique identification is possible with geometric constraints. Finally, we confirm that we can estimate the reduced model uniquely by incorporating these constraints.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2025.
Builds on
18 of 45 references.
References · 18
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
- 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
- 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 335
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
- 2017Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 208
- 2019Hamiltonian Generative Networkscited by 136
- 2022Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey on Problems, Methods and Applicationscited by 88
- 2020AI Poincar'e: Machine Learning Conservation Laws from Trajectoriescited by 77
- 2020Discovering Symmetry Invariants and Conserved Quantities by Interpreting Siamese Neural Networkscited by 33
- 2021Machine-learning hidden symmetriescited by 31
6 more
- 2023Solving Forward and Inverse Problems of Contact Mechanics using Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 17
- 2019Learning Symmetries of Classical Integrable Systemscited by 15
- 2018Discovering conservation laws from data for controlcited by 14
- 2022Discovering Conservation Laws using Optimal Transport and Manifold Learningcited by 12
- 2019Interpretable Conservation Law Estimation by Deriving the Symmetries of Dynamics from Trained Deep Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2024Selecting fitted models under epistemic uncertainty using a stochastic process on quantile functionscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.