mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AIM: Software and Hardware Co-design for Architecture-level IR-drop Mitigation in High-performance PIM

arXiv 2511.04321 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2025cs.AR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

SRAM Processing-in-Memory (PIM) has emerged as the most promising implementation for high-performance PIM, delivering superior computing density, energy efficiency, and computational precision. However, the pursuit of higher performance necessitates more complex circuit designs and increased operating frequencies, which exacerbate IR-drop issues. Severe IR-drop can significantly degrade chip performance and even threaten reliability. Conventional circuit-level IR-drop mitigation methods, such as back-end optimizations, are resource-intensive and often compromise power, performance, and area (PPA). To address these challenges, we propose AIM, comprehensive software and hardware co-design for architecture-level IR-drop mitigation in high-performance PIM. Initially, leveraging the bit-serial and in-situ dataflow processing properties of PIM, we introduce Rtog and HR, which establish a direct correlation between PIM workloads and IR-drop. Building on this foundation, we propose LHR and WDS, enabling extensive exploration of architecture-level IR-drop mitigation while maintaining computational accuracy through software optimization. Subsequently, we develop IR-Booster, a dynamic adjustment mechanism that integrates software-level HR information with hardware-based IR-drop monitoring to adapt the V-f pairs of the PIM macro, achieving enhanced energy efficiency and performance. Finally, we propose the HR-aware task mapping method, bridging software and hardware designs to achieve optimal improvement. Post-layout simulation results on a 7nm 256-TOPS PIM chip demonstrate that AIM achieves up to 69.2% IR-drop mitigation, resulting in 2.29x energy efficiency improvement and 1.152x speedup.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2025.

Builds on

16 of 89 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  6. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,838
  7. 2021BRECQ: Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization by Block Reconstructioncited by 464
  8. 2021A White Paper on Neural Network Quantizationcited by 453
  9. 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 373
  10. 2022BEVFormer v2: Adapting Modern Image Backbones to Bird's-Eye-View Recognition via Perspective Supervisioncited by 302
  11. 2020Computing Systems for Autonomous Driving: State-of-the-Art and Challengescited by 47
  12. 2020A Modern Primer on Processing in Memorycited by 30
4 more
  1. 2024The Landscape of Compute-near-memory and Compute-in-memory: A Research and Commercial Overviewcited by 8
  2. 2024A Review of SRAM-based Compute-in-Memory Circuitscited by 5
  3. 2021A Deep Learning Object Detection Method for an Efficient Clusters Initializationcited by 4
  4. 2024One-Step Forward and Backtrack: Overcoming Zig-Zagging in Loss-Aware Quantization Trainingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.