On the Brittleness of CLIP Text Encoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal co-embedding models, especially CLIP, have advanced the state of the art in zero-shot classification and multimedia information retrieval in recent years by aligning images and text in a shared representation space. However, such modals trained on a contrastive alignment can lack stability towards small input perturbations. Especially when dealing with manually expressed queries, minor variations in the query can cause large differences in the ranking of the best-matching results. In this paper, we present a systematic analysis of the effect of multiple classes of non-semantic query perturbations in an multimedia information retrieval scenario. We evaluate a diverse set of lexical, syntactic, and semantic perturbations across multiple CLIP variants using the TRECVID Ad-Hoc Video Search queries and the V3C1 video collection. Across models, we find that syntactic and semantic perturbations drive the largest instabilities, while brittleness is concentrated in trivial surface edits such as punctuation and case. Our results highlight robustness as a critical dimension for evaluating vision-language models beyond benchmark accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2025.
Builds on
30 of 37 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 735
- 2021FLAVA: A Foundational Language And Vision Alignment Modelcited by 649
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
- 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 577
18 more
- 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 561
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
- 2019Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNetcited by 260
- 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoningcited by 254
- 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Tencited by 198
- 2022OmniVL:One Foundation Model for Image-Language and Video-Language Taskscited by 143
- 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 102
- 2025Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negationcited by 72
- 2024Learn "No" to Say "Yes" Better: Improving Vision-Language Models via Negationscited by 46
- 2024The Double-Ellipsoid Geometry of CLIPcited by 42
- 2024It's Not a Modality Gap: Characterizing and Addressing the Contrastive Gapcited by 26
- 2025Is CLIP ideal? No. Can we fix it? Yes!cited by 21
- 2021A Fistful of Words: Learning Transferable Visual Models from Bag-of-Words Supervisioncited by 19
- 2023On the Difference of BERT-style and CLIP-style Text Encoderscited by 15
- 2018V3C - a Research Video Collectioncited by 12
- 2024Do Pre-trained Vision-Language Models Encode Object States?cited by 7
- 2024Fine-tuning CLIP Text Encoders with Two-step Paraphrasingcited by 6
- 2025Robustness in Both Domains: CLIP Needs a Robust Text Encodercited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Beyond Standard Benchmarks: A Systematic Audit of Vision-Language Model's Robustness to Natural Semantic Variation Across Diverse Taskscited by 0
- 2026HANCLIP: A Family of Hyperbolic Angular Negation Vision Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026NeuroStrata: An Electroencephalographic Connectivity-Aware Deep Representation Learning Framework for Dynamic Brain Network Analysis of Mental Stresscited by 0
- 2026HANCLIP: A Family of Hyperbolic Angular Negation Vision Language Models22 Jun 2026
- 2026NeuroStrata: An Electroencephalographic Connectivity-Aware Deep Representation Learning Framework for Dynamic Brain Network Analysis of Mental Stress17 Jun 2026
- 2026Beyond Standard Benchmarks: A Systematic Audit of Vision-Language Model's Robustness to Natural Semantic Variation Across Diverse Tasks6 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Benchmark Granularity and Model Robustness for Image-Text Retrieval
- 2025Vision-Free Retrieval: Rethinking Multimodal Search with Textual Scene Descriptions
- 2024Toward a Holistic Evaluation of Robustness in CLIP Models
- 2025CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation
- 2026BRIDGE: Multimodal-to-Text Retrieval via Reinforcement-Learned Query Alignment
- 2026A Paragraph is Worth a Thousand Captions: Rethinking Text Supervision for Vision-Language Retrieval
- 2025Mitigating Semantic Collapse in Partially Relevant Video Retrieval
- 2026TAME: Temporal-Aware Mixture-of-Experts for Text-Video Retrieval