mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GRAD: Graph-Retrieved Adaptive Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation

arXiv 2511.03900 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2025cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hallucination mitigation remains a persistent challenge for large language models (LLMs), even as model scales grow. Existing approaches often rely on external knowledge sources, such as structured databases or knowledge graphs, accessed through prompting or retrieval. However, prompt-based grounding is fragile and domain-sensitive, while symbolic knowledge integration incurs heavy retrieval and formatting costs. Motivated by knowledge graphs, we introduce Graph-Retrieved Adaptive Decoding (GRAD), a decoding-time method that grounds generation in corpus-derived evidence without retraining. GRAD constructs a sparse token transition graph by accumulating next-token logits across a small retrieved corpus in a single forward pass. During decoding, graph-retrieved logits are max-normalized and adaptively fused with model logits to favor high-evidence continuations while preserving fluency. Across three models and a range of question-answering benchmarks spanning intrinsic, extrinsic hallucination, and factuality tasks, GRAD consistently surpasses baselines, achieving up to 9.7% higher intrinsic accuracy, 8.6% lower hallucination rates, and 6.9% greater correctness compared to greedy decoding, while attaining the highest truth--informativeness product score among all methods. GRAD offers a lightweight, plug-and-play alternative to contrastive decoding and knowledge graph augmentation, demonstrating that statistical evidence from corpus-level token transitions can effectively steer generation toward more truthful and verifiable outputs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.

Builds on

23 of 28 references.

References · 23

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  5. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  6. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  7. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  8. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  9. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
  10. 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
  11. 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
  12. 2015LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embeddingcited by 582
11 more
  1. 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 376
  2. 2018Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 345
  3. 2023Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicinecited by 329
  4. 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
  5. 2019K-BERT: Enabling Language Representation with Knowledge Graphcited by 304
  6. 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 283
  7. 2022Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examplescited by 235
  8. 2024FaithEval: Can Your Language Model Stay Faithful to Context, Even If "The Moon is Made of Marshmallows"cited by 86
  9. 2023MindMap: Knowledge Graph Prompting Sparks Graph of Thoughts in Large Language Modelscited by 73
  10. 2023Instructive Decoding: Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models are Self-Refiner from Noisy Instructionscited by 24
  11. 2025Retrieval-augmented Decoding for Improving Truthfulness in Open-ended Generationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.