A Modular, Data-Free Pipeline for Multi-Label Intention Recognition in Transportation Agentic AI Applications
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
In this study, a modular, data-free pipeline for multi-label intention recognition is proposed for agentic AI applications in transportation. Unlike traditional intent recognition systems that depend on large, annotated corpora and often struggle with fine-grained, multi-label discrimination, our approach eliminates the need for costly data collection while enhancing the accuracy of multi-label intention understanding. Specifically, the overall pipeline, named DMTC, consists of three steps: 1) using prompt engineering to guide large language models (LLMs) to generate diverse synthetic queries in different transport scenarios; 2) encoding each textual query with a Sentence-T5 model to obtain compact semantic embeddings; 3) training a lightweight classifier using a novel online focal-contrastive (OFC) loss that emphasizes hard samples and maximizes inter-class separability. The applicability of the proposed pipeline is demonstrated in an agentic AI application in the maritime transportation context. Extensive experiments show that DMTC achieves a Hamming loss of 5.35% and an AUC of 95.92%, outperforming state-of-the-art multi-label classifiers and recent end-to-end SOTA LLM-based baselines. Further analysis reveals that Sentence-T5 embeddings improve subset accuracy by at least 3.29% over alternative encoders, and integrating the OFC loss yields an additional 0.98% gain compared to standard contrastive objectives. In conclusion, our system seamlessly routes user queries to task-specific modules (e.g., ETA information, traffic risk evaluation, and other typical scenarios in the transportation domain), laying the groundwork for fully autonomous, intention-aware agents without costly manual labelling.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.
Builds on
4 of 31 references.
References · 4
- 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 463
- 2022ATCO2 corpus: A Large-Scale Dataset for Research on Automatic Speech Recognition and Natural Language Understanding of Air Traffic Control Communicationscited by 19
- 2024Prediction of Vessel Arrival Time to Pilotage Area Using Multi-Data Fusion and Deep Learningcited by 3
- 2021A Natural Language Processing and Deep Learning based Model for Automated Vehicle Diagnostics using Free-Text Customer Service Reportscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025LLM-Guided Semantic Relational Reasoning for Multimodal Intent Recognition
- 2025Efficient Intent-Based Filtering for Multi-Party Conversations Using Knowledge Distillation from LLMs
- 2024LARA: Linguistic-Adaptive Retrieval-Augmentation for Multi-Turn Intent Classification
- 2025Auto-Prompting with Retrieval Guidance for Frame Detection in Logistics
- 2025Don't Just Demo, Teach Me the Principles: A Principle-Based Multi-Agent Prompting Strategy for Text Classification
- 2026Unsupervised Multimodal Intent Discovery via MLLM-Guided Concept Generation and Semantic Propagation ↗
- 2026Neural Router: Semantic Content Matching for Agentic AI
- 2024Intent Detection in the Age of LLMs