Influence of Data Dimensionality Reduction Methods on the Effectiveness of Quantum Machine Learning Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data dimensionality reduction techniques are often utilized in the implementation of Quantum Machine Learning models to address two significant issues: the constraints of NISQ quantum devices, which are characterized by noise and a limited number of qubits, and the challenge of simulating a large number of qubits on classical devices. It also raises concerns over the scalability of these approaches, as dimensionality reduction methods are slow to adapt to large datasets. In this article, we analyze how data reduction methods affect different QML models. We conduct this experiment over several generated datasets, quantum machine algorithms, quantum data encoding methods, and data reduction methods. All these models were evaluated on the performance metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Our findings have led us to conclude that the usage of data dimensionality reduction methods results in skewed performance metric values, which results in wrongly estimating the actual performance of quantum machine learning models. There are several factors, along with data dimensionality reduction methods, that worsen this problem, such as characteristics of the datasets, classical to quantum information embedding methods, percentage of feature reduction, classical components associated with quantum models, and structure of quantum machine learning models. We consistently observed the difference in the accuracy range of 14% to 48% amongst these models, using data reduction and not using it. Apart from this, our observations have shown that some data reduction methods tend to perform better for some specific data embedding methodologies and ansatz constructions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.
Builds on
6 of 25 references.
References · 6
- 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
- 2024Better than classical? The subtle art of benchmarking quantum machine learning modelscited by 82
- 2021Training Quantum Embedding Kernels on Near-Term Quantum Computerscited by 69
- 2020Towards Ground Truth Explainability on Tabular Datacited by 4
- 2024The Impact of Feature Embedding Placement in the Ansatz of a Quantum Kernel in QSVMscited by 2
- 2023A Post-Training Approach for Mitigating Overfitting in Quantum Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.