Climate Adaptation with Reinforcement Learning: Economic vs. Quality of Life Adaptation Pathways
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Climate change will cause an increase in the frequency and severity of flood events, prompting the need for cohesive adaptation policymaking. Designing effective adaptation policies, however, depends on managing the uncertainty of long-term climate impacts. Meanwhile, such policies can feature important normative choices that are not always made explicit. We propose that Reinforcement Learning (RL) can be a useful tool to both identify adaptation pathways under uncertain conditions while it also allows for the explicit modelling (and consequent comparison) of different adaptation priorities (e.g. economic vs. wellbeing). We use an Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) to link together a rainfall and flood model, and compute the impacts of flooding in terms of quality of life (QoL), transportation, and infrastructure damage. Our results show that models prioritising QoL over economic impacts results in more adaptation spending as well as a more even distribution of spending over the study area, highlighting the extent to which such normative assumptions can alter adaptation policy. Our framework is publicly available: https://github.com/MLSM-at-DTU/maat_qol_framework.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.
Builds on
5 of 29 references.
References · 5
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2020A Closer Look at Invalid Action Masking in Policy Gradient Algorithmscited by 160
- 2025Modeling and Analyzing Urban Networks and Amenities with OSMnxcited by 25
- 2022Choices, Risks, and Reward Reports: Charting Public Policy for Reinforcement Learning Systemscited by 12
- 2025Stable Tree Labelling for Accelerating Distance Queries on Dynamic Road Networkscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.