mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Who Sees the Risk? Stakeholder Conflicts and Explanatory Policies in LLM-based Risk Assessment

arXiv 2511.03152 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding how different stakeholders perceive risks in AI systems is essential for their responsible deployment. This paper presents a framework for stakeholder-grounded risk assessment by using LLMs, acting as judges to predict and explain risks. Using the Risk Atlas Nexus and GloVE explanation method, our framework generates stakeholder-specific, interpretable policies that shows how different stakeholders agree or disagree about the same risks. We demonstrate our method using three real-world AI use cases of medical AI, autonomous vehicles, and fraud detection domain. We further propose an interactive visualization that reveals how and why conflicts emerge across stakeholder perspectives, enhancing transparency in conflict reasoning. Our results show that stakeholder perspectives significantly influence risk perception and conflict patterns. Our work emphasizes the importance of these stakeholder-aware explanations needed to make LLM-based evaluations more transparent, interpretable, and aligned with human-centered AI governance goals.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.

Builds on

9 of 15 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluationcited by 299
  2. 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traitscited by 229
  3. 2024Quantifying the Persona Effect in LLM Simulationscited by 164
  4. 2024SG-Bench: Evaluating LLM Safety Generalization Across Diverse Tasks and Prompt Typescited by 58
  5. 2024Beyond prompt brittleness: Evaluating the reliability and consistency of political worldviews in LLMscited by 55
  6. 2025Know Thy Judge: On the Robustness Meta-Evaluation of LLM Safety Judgescited by 19
  7. 2025Persona-Assigned Large Language Models Exhibit Human-Like Motivated Reasoningcited by 12
  8. 2024Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI Governancecited by 2
  9. 2025Interpreting LLM-as-a-Judge Policies via Verifiable Global Explanationscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.