TRACE: Textual Reasoning for Affordance Coordinate Extraction
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) struggle to translate high-level instructions into the precise spatial affordances required for robotic manipulation. While visual Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methods exist, they are often computationally intensive. In this work, we introduce TRACE (Textual Reasoning for Affordance Coordinate Extraction), a novel methodology that integrates a textual Chain of Reasoning (CoR) into the affordance prediction process. We use this methodology to create the TRACE dataset, a large-scale collection created via an autonomous pipeline that pairs instructions with explicit textual rationales. By fine-tuning a VLM on this data, our model learns to externalize its spatial reasoning before acting. Our experiments show that our TRACE-tuned model achieves state-of-the-art performance, reaching 48.1% accuracy on the primary Where2Place (W2P) benchmark (a 9.6% relative improvement) and 55.0% on the more challenging W2P(h) subset. Crucially, an ablation study demonstrates that performance scales directly with the amount of reasoning data used, confirming the CoR's effectiveness. Furthermore, analysis of the model's attention maps reveals an interpretable reasoning process where focus shifts dynamically across reasoning steps. This work shows that training VLMs to generate a textual CoR is an effective and robust strategy for enhancing the precision, reliability, and interpretability of VLM-based robot control. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/jink-ucla/TRACE
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.
Builds on
16 of 32 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025ManipBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Low-Level Robot Manipulation14 May
- 2024ReKep: Spatio-Temporal Reasoning of Relational Keypoint Constraints for Robotic Manipulation3 Sep
Other references · 14
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,598
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
- 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,210
- 2023VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Modelscited by 750
- 2024RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Roboticscited by 251
- 2025Imagine while Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thoughtcited by 206
- 2025MLLMs Know Where to Look: Training-free Perception of Small Visual Details with Multimodal LLMscited by 176
- 2025ReFocus: Visual Editing as a Chain of Thought for Structured Image Understandingcited by 83
- 2025A0: An Affordance-Aware Hierarchical Model for General Robotic Manipulationcited by 45
- 2025v1: Learning to Point Visual Tokens for Multimodal Grounded Reasoningcited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024CoA-VLA: Improving Vision-Language-Action Models via Visual-Textual Chain-of-Affordance
- 2026StateVLM: A State-Aware Vision-Language Model for Robotic Affordance Reasoning
- 2026AffordanceVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model Empowering Action Generation through Affordance-Aware Understanding
- 2024MOKA: Open-World Robotic Manipulation through Mark-Based Visual Prompting
- 2025Affordance Field Intervention: Enabling VLAs to Escape Memory Traps in Robotic Manipulation
- 2025AffordGrasp: In-Context Affordance Reasoning for Open-Vocabulary Task-Oriented Grasping in Clutter
- 2024ManipVQA: Injecting Robotic Affordance and Physically Grounded Information into Multi-Modal Large Language Models
- 2025From Seeing to Doing: Bridging Reasoning and Decision for Robotic Manipulation