A Detailed Study on LLM Biases Concerning Corporate Social Responsibility and Green Supply Chains
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Organizations increasingly use Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve supply chain processes and reduce environmental impacts. However, LLMs have been shown to reproduce biases regarding the prioritization of sustainable business strategies. Thus, it is important to identify underlying training data biases that LLMs pertain regarding the importance and role of sustainable business and supply chain practices. This study investigates how different LLMs respond to validated surveys about the role of ethics and responsibility for businesses, and the importance of sustainable practices and relations with suppliers and customers. Using standardized questionnaires, we systematically analyze responses generated by state-of-the-art LLMs to identify variations. We further evaluate whether differences are augmented by four organizational culture types, thereby evaluating the practical relevance of identified biases. The findings reveal significant systematic differences between models and demonstrate that organizational culture prompts substantially modify LLM responses. The study holds important implications for LLM-assisted decision-making in sustainability contexts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.
Builds on
19 of 81 references.
References · 19
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
- 2023Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 144
- 2019The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goalscited by 100
- 2023A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 91
- 2023The Self-Perception and Political Biases of ChatGPTcited by 66
- 2025Large Language Model Psychometrics: A Systematic Review of Evaluation, Validation, and Enhancementcited by 41
- 2024Prompting Techniques for Reducing Social Bias in LLMs through System 1 and System 2 Cognitive Processescited by 38
- 2024Large Language Models are Biased Because They Are Large Language Modelscited by 26
- 2024Whose Morality Do They Speak? Unraveling Cultural Bias in Multilingual Language Modelscited by 17
7 more
- 2023Women Are Beautiful, Men Are Leaders: Gender Stereotypes in Machine Translation and Language Modelingcited by 12
- 2025Analyzing Political Bias in LLMs via Target-Oriented Sentiment Classificationcited by 7
- 2025The Potential of Large Language Models in Supply Chain Management: Advancing Decision-Making, Efficiency, and Innovationcited by 3
- 2024Is GPT-4 Less Politically Biased than GPT-3.5? A Renewed Investigation of ChatGPT's Political Biasescited by 2
- 2025When Bias Backfires: The Modulatory Role of Counterfactual Explanations on the Adoption of Algorithmic Bias in XAI-Supported Human Decision-Makingcited by 2
- 2025Choosing a Model, Shaping a Future: Comparing LLM Perspectives on Sustainability and its Relationship with AIcited by 2
- 2016Rank-Based Procedures in Factorial Designs: Hypotheses about Nonparametric Treatment Effectscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.