mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Curvature Rate λ: A Scalar Measure of Input-Space Sharpness in Neural Networks

arXiv 2511.01438 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Curvature influences generalization, robustness, and how reliably neural networks respond to small input perturbations. Existing sharpness metrics are typically defined in parameter space (e.g., Hessian eigenvalues) and can be expensive, sensitive to reparameterization, and difficult to interpret in functional terms. We introduce a scalar curvature measure defined directly in input space: the curvature rate λ, given by the exponential growth rate of higher-order input derivatives. Empirically, λ is estimated as the slope of log ||Dn f|| versus n for small n. This growth-rate perspective unifies classical analytic quantities: for analytic functions, λ corresponds to the inverse radius of convergence, and for bandlimited signals, it reflects the spectral cutoff. The same principle extends to neural networks, where λ tracks the emergence of high-frequency structure in the decision boundary. Experiments on analytic functions and neural networks (Two Moons and MNIST) show that λ evolves predictably during training and can be directly shaped using a simple derivative-based regularizer, Curvature Rate Regularization (CRR). Compared to Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), CRR achieves similar accuracy while yielding flatter input-space geometry and improved confidence calibration. By grounding curvature in differentiation dynamics, λ provides a compact, interpretable, and parameterization-invariant descriptor of functional smoothness in learned models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.

Builds on

12 of 13 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  2. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  3. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  4. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  5. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  6. 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
  7. 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
  8. 2019An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Densitycited by 289
  9. 2019Towards Understanding the Spectral Bias of Deep Learningcited by 173
  10. 2016Eigenvalues of the Hessian in Deep Learning: Singularity and Beyondcited by 156
  11. 2019Normalized Flat Minima: Exploring Scale Invariant Definition of Flat Minima for Neural Networks using PAC-Bayesian Analysiscited by 58
  12. 2021Unveiling the structure of wide flat minima in neural networkscited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.