Learning to Seek Evidence: A Verifiable Reasoning Agent with Causal Faithfulness Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explanations for AI models in high-stakes domains like medicine often lack verifiability, which can hinder trust. To address this, we propose an interactive agent that produces explanations through an auditable sequence of actions. The agent learns a policy to strategically seek external visual evidence to support its diagnostic reasoning. This policy is optimized using reinforcement learning, resulting in a model that is both efficient and generalizable. Our experiments show that this action-based reasoning process significantly improves calibrated accuracy, reducing the Brier score by 18% compared to a non-interactive baseline. To validate the faithfulness of the agent's explanations, we introduce a causal intervention method. By masking the visual evidence the agent chooses to use, we observe a measurable degradation in its performance (DeltaBrier=+0.029), confirming that the evidence is integral to its decision-making process. Our work provides a practical framework for building AI systems with verifiable and faithful reasoning capabilities.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.
Builds on
20 of 25 references.
References · 20
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
- 2023Visual ChatGPT: Talking, Drawing and Editing with Visual Foundation Modelscited by 668
8 more
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
- 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoningcited by 603
- 2023BiomedCLIP: a multimodal biomedical foundation model pretrained from fifteen million scientific image-text pairscited by 520
- 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
- 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
- 2025Self-Adapting Language Modelscited by 84
- 2021Explainable Medical Imaging AI Needs Human-Centered Design: Guidelines and Evidence from a Systematic Reviewcited by 30
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026TRACE: Training Reasoning Agents for Causal Exploration with Synthesized Rewards
- 2026MedAgent-R1: Faithfulness-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Evidence-Grounded Medical Reasoning
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Evidence-Seeking Diagnostic Reasoning with Large Language Models
- 2026VERITAS: A Multi-Agent Co-Scientist for Verifiable Image-Derived Hypothesis Testing ↗
- 2026CIVeX: Causal Intervention Verification for Language Agents
- 2026Scaling Medical Reasoning Verification via Tool-Integrated Reinforcement Learning
- 2026From Given to Gathered Evidence: Agentic Learning for Longitudinal Medical Reasoning
- 2026MIRA: Medical Image Reflection for Agentic Diagnosis