PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Natural Language Inference (NLI) models have been used in various ways to improve the factuality of LLM outputs. This is typically done by applying an NLI model to judge whether the model output is entailed from the supposed evidence, triggering some corrective actions, such as beam reranking at inference time or RL rewards during training. While NLI models are trained to detect factual inconsistencies over complete sentences, decisions in the common autoregressive generation architecture are made for each evolving text prefix, during decoding. Addressing this setting, we generalize the entailment detection task to apply over arbitrary text prefixes, and suggest its utility for improving generation faithfulness. Providing suitable evaluation and training datasets for this task, we train MiniTruePrefixes, a novel specialized model that better detects factual inconsistencies over text prefixes, outperforming comparable baseline NLI models by 5-14 F1 points in prefix-level entailment. We further demonstrate that integrating MiniTruePrefixes into a controlled decoding framework substantially improves factual consistency in abstractive summarization. When guided by MiniTruePrefixes, LLaMA-3.2-3B-Instruct matches the faithfulness and runtime of the 8B model from the same model family, while using only half the memory.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.
Builds on
28 of 39 references.
References · 28
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
- 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
- 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 952
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
- 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 613
- 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
16 more
- 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 376
- 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
- 2023How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowballcited by 311
- 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 283
- 2024MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documentscited by 257
- 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 221
- 2023Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Taskscited by 169
- 2023Human-like Summarization Evaluation with ChatGPTcited by 126
- 2023Reward-Augmented Decoding: Efficient Controlled Text Generation With a Unidirectional Reward Modelcited by 79
- 2023Factually Consistent Summarization via Reinforcement Learning with Textual Entailment Feedbackcited by 72
- 2022FactPEGASUS: Factuality-Aware Pre-training and Fine-tuning for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 49
- 2023LLMs as Factual Reasoners: Insights from Existing Benchmarks and Beyondcited by 38
- 2023Faithfulness-Aware Decoding Strategies for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 31
- 2024Learning to Refine with Fine-Grained Natural Language Feedbackcited by 27
- 2024UniSumEval: Towards Unified, Fine-Grained, Multi-Dimensional Summarization Evaluation for LLMscited by 21
- 2022Improved Beam Search for Hallucination Mitigation in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.