FEval-TTC: Fair Evaluation Protocol for Test-Time Compute
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
The performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) and the associated dollar costs of API calls can fluctuate over time, potentially invalidating conclusions drawn in prior research. To address this, we propose a Fair Evaluation protocol for Test-Time Compute (FEval-TTC), designed to ensure consistent assessment of test-time compute (TTC) methods, regardless of such fluctuations. FEval-TTC focuses on the evaluation of TTC methods that utilize underlying Chains-of-Thought (CoT). It supports evaluations across multiple LLMs on a diverse set of mathematical and commonsense reasoning datasets. The few-shot prompting and answer extraction processes are standardized across datasets, reducing both time and monetary overhead for researchers. Furthermore, we provide a cost modelling procedure that estimates both the token and dollar cost per query, facilitating equitable comparisons of prevalent TTC methods. We open-source FEval-TTC for public use at https://github.com/networkslab/feval_ttc .
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 6 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.
Builds on
6 of 19 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Do We Truly Need So Many Samples? Multi-LLM Repeated Sampling Efficiently Scales Test-Time Compute1 Apr
- 2025Towards Thinking-Optimal Scaling of Test-Time Compute for LLM Reasoning25 Feb
- 2025A Survey of Test-Time Compute: From Intuitive Inference to Deliberate Reasoning5 Jan
- 2024Path-Consistency with Prefix Enhancement for Efficient Inference in LLMs25 Aug
- 2024Make Every Penny Count: Difficulty-Adaptive Self-Consistency for Cost-Efficient Reasoning24 Aug
Other references · 1
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Tasks
- 2025The Energy Cost of Reasoning: Analyzing Energy Usage in LLMs with Test-time Compute
- 2026ThinkBooster: A Unified Framework for Seamless Test-Time Scaling of LLM Reasoning
- 2025Can 1B LLM Surpass 405B LLM? Rethinking Compute-Optimal Test-Time Scaling
- 2024TurtleBench: Evaluating Top Language Models via Real-World Yes/No Puzzles
- 2026Test-Time Augmentation for LLMs: When Input Diversity Beats Output Diversity at Matched Compute
- 2025RTTC: Reward-Guided Collaborative Test-Time Compute
- 2026How Much Can Language Models Gain from Test-Time Computation?