mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Keys in the Weights: Transformer Authentication Using Model-Bound Latent Representations

arXiv 2511.00973 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2025cs.CR cs.AI eess.SPcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce Model-Bound Latent Exchange (MoBLE), a decoder-binding property in Transformer autoencoders formalized as Zero-Shot Decoder Non-Transferability (ZSDN). In identity tasks using iso-architectural models trained on identical data but differing in seeds, self-decoding achieves more than 0.91 exact match and 0.98 token accuracy, while zero-shot cross-decoding collapses to chance without exact matches. This separation arises without injected secrets or adversarial training, and is corroborated by weight-space distances and attention-divergence diagnostics. We interpret ZSDN as model binding, a latent-based authentication and access-control mechanism, even when the architecture and training recipe are public: encoder's hidden state representation deterministically reveals the plaintext, yet only the correctly keyed decoder reproduces it in zero-shot. We formally define ZSDN, a decoder-binding advantage metric, and outline deployment considerations for secure artificial intelligence (AI) pipelines. Finally, we discuss learnability risks (e.g., adapter alignment) and outline mitigations. MoBLE offers a lightweight, accelerator-friendly approach to secure AI deployment in safety-critical domains, including aviation and cyber-physical systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2025.

Builds on

25 of 42 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  4. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  5. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  6. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  7. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  8. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  9. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
  10. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
  11. 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 334
  12. 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
13 more
  1. 2021The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networkscited by 285
  2. 2017Embedding Watermarks into Deep Neural Networkscited by 227
  3. 2017An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layercited by 227
  4. 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 215
  5. 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 203
  6. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 170
  7. 2023Stitchable Neural Networkscited by 26
  8. 2023Primer: Fast Private Transformer Inference on Encrypted Datacited by 19
  9. 2022Image and Model Transformation with Secret Key for Vision Transformercited by 12
  10. 2016Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptographycited by 11
  11. 2023Model Stitching: Looking For Functional Similarity Between Representationscited by 10
  12. 2023Block-Wise Encryption for Reliable Vision Transformer modelscited by 3
  13. 2025Private Transformer Inference in MLaaS: A Surveycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.