mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Erasing 'Ugly' from the Internet: Propagation of the Beauty Myth in Text-Image Models

arXiv 2511.00749 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2025cs.CV cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Social media has exacerbated the promotion of Western beauty norms, leading to negative self-image, particularly in women and girls, and causing harm such as body dysmorphia. Increasingly content on the internet has been artificially generated, leading to concerns that these norms are being exaggerated. The aim of this work is to study how generative AI models may encode 'beauty' and erase 'ugliness', and discuss the implications of this for society. To investigate these aims, we create two image generation pipelines: a text-to-image model and a text-to-language model-to image model. We develop a structured beauty taxonomy which we use to prompt three language models (LMs) and two text-to-image models to cumulatively generate 5984 images using our two pipelines. We then recruit women and non-binary social media users to evaluate 1200 of the images through a Likert-scale within-subjects study. Participants show high agreement in their ratings. Our results show that 86.5% of generated images depicted people with lighter skin tones, 22% contained explicit content despite Safe for Work (SFW) training, and 74% were rated as being in a younger age demographic. In particular, the images of non-binary individuals were rated as both younger and more hypersexualised, indicating troubling intersectional effects. Notably, prompts encoded with 'negative' or 'ugly' beauty traits (such as "a wide nose") consistently produced higher Not SFW (NSFW) ratings regardless of gender. This work sheds light on the pervasive demographic biases related to beauty standards present in generative AI models -- biases that are actively perpetuated by model developers, such as via negative prompting. We conclude by discussing the implications of this on society, which include pollution of the data streams and active erasure of features that do not fall inside the stereotype of what is considered beautiful by developers.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2025.

Builds on

11 of 52 references.

References · 11

  1. 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
  2. 2023Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language Modelscited by 204
  3. 2019Black is to Criminal as Caucasian is to Police: Detecting and Removing Multiclass Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 146
  4. 2023Into the LAIONs Den: Investigating Hate in Multimodal Datasetscited by 54
  5. 2024Understanding the Impact of Negative Prompts: When and How Do They Take Effect?cited by 50
  6. 2020Demographics Should Not Be the Reason of Toxicity: Mitigating Discrimination in Text Classifications with Instance Weightingcited by 41
  7. 2023Investigating Subtler Biases in LLMs: Ageism, Beauty, Institutional, and Nationality Bias in Generative Modelscited by 32
  8. 2020Unequal Representations: Analyzing Intersectional Biases in Word Embeddings Using Representational Similarity Analysiscited by 12
  9. 2024Classist Tools: Social Class Correlates with Performance in NLPcited by 9
  10. 2024Improving image synthesis with diffusion-negative samplingcited by 8
  11. 2024Lookism: The overlooked bias in computer visioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.