A Hierarchical Imprecise Probability Approach to Reliability Assessment of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across diverse domains, raising the need for rigorous reliability assessment methods. Existing benchmark-based evaluations primarily offer descriptive statistics of model accuracy over datasets, providing limited insight into the probabilistic behavior of LLMs under real operational conditions. This paper introduces HIP-LLM, a Hierarchical Imprecise Probability framework for modeling and inferring LLM reliability. Building upon the foundations of software reliability engineering, HIP-LLM defines LLM reliability as the probability of failure-free operation over a specified number of future tasks under a given Operational Profile (OP). HIP-LLM represents dependencies across (sub-)domains hierarchically, enabling multi-level inference from subdomain to system-level reliability. HIP-LLM embeds imprecise priors to capture epistemic uncertainty and incorporates OPs to reflect usage contexts. It derives posterior reliability envelopes that quantify uncertainty across priors and data. Experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that HIP-LLM offers a more accurate and standardized reliability characterization than existing benchmark and state-of-the-art approaches. A publicly accessible repository of HIP-LLM is provided.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2025.
Builds on
42 of 86 references.
References · 42
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
- 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
- 2022Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasonerscited by 518
- 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 442
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
- 2023MM-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 255
30 more
- 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 229
- 2023SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 189
- 2023Conformal Language Modelingcited by 163
- 2024Adding Error Bars to Evals: A Statistical Approach to Language Model Evaluationscited by 130
- 2023A Survey of Safety and Trustworthiness of Large Language Models through the Lens of Verification and Validationcited by 91
- 2024Clio: Privacy-Preserving Insights into Real-World AI Usecited by 66
- 2024ConU: Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Correctness Coverage Guaranteescited by 62
- 2024SG-Bench: Evaluating LLM Safety Generalization Across Diverse Tasks and Prompt Typescited by 58
- 2025Large Language Model Psychometrics: A Systematic Review of Evaluation, Validation, and Enhancementcited by 41
- 2024HumanEval Pro and MBPP Pro: Evaluating Large Language Models on Self-invoking Code Generationcited by 39
- 2024LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language Modelscited by 38
- 2025The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMscited by 24
- 2020A Safety Framework for Critical Systems Utilising Deep Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2025HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Taskscited by 19
- 2024CEB: Compositional Evaluation Benchmark for Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2021Reliability Assessment and Safety Arguments for Machine Learning Components in System Assurancecited by 16
- 2019Assessing the Safety and Reliability of Autonomous Vehicles from Road Testingcited by 15
- 2025HiBayES: A Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Framework for AI Evaluation Statisticscited by 14
- 2023Safety Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Case Study of STPA using ChatGPTcited by 13
- 2018Probabilistic Model Checking of Robots Deployed in Extreme Environmentscited by 12
- 2021Assessing the Reliability of Deep Learning Classifiers Through Robustness Evaluation and Operational Profilescited by 11
- 2024ProTIP: Probabilistic Robustness Verification on Text-to-Image Diffusion Models against Stochastic Perturbationcited by 10
- 2020Assessing Safety-Critical Systems from Operational Testing: A Study on Autonomous Vehiclescited by 9
- 2022Hierarchical Distribution-Aware Testing of Deep Learningcited by 8
- 2023Bayesian Learning for the Robust Verification of Autonomous Robotscited by 6
- 2024CoDefeater: Using LLMs To Find Defeaters in Assurance Casescited by 5
- 2025On the Need for a Statistical Foundation in Scenario-Based Testing of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 4
- 2016Bayesian Nonparametric System Reliability using Sets of Priorscited by 3
- 2022The Unnecessity of Assuming Statistically Independent Tests in Bayesian Software Reliability Assessmentscited by 3
- 2024Automating Semantic Analysis of System Assurance Cases using Goal-directed ASPcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.