Towards Reliable Sea Ice Drift Estimation in the Arctic Deep Learning Optical Flow on RADARSAT-2
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate estimation of sea ice drift is critical for Arctic navigation, climate research, and operational forecasting. While optical flow, a computer vision technique for estimating pixel wise motion between consecutive images, has advanced rapidly in computer vision, its applicability to geophysical problems and to satellite SAR imagery remains underexplored. Classical optical flow methods rely on mathematical models and strong assumptions about motion, which limit their accuracy in complex scenarios. Recent deep learning based approaches have substantially improved performance and are now the standard in computer vision, motivating their application to sea ice drift estimation. We present the first large scale benchmark of 48 deep learning optical flow models on RADARSAT 2 ScanSAR sea ice imagery, evaluated with endpoint error (EPE) and Fl all metrics against GNSS tracked buoys. Several models achieve sub kilometer accuracy (EPE 6 to 8 pixels, 300 to 400 m), a small error relative to the spatial scales of sea ice motion and typical navigation requirements in the Arctic. Our results demonstrate that the models are capable of capturing consistent regional drift patterns and that recent deep learning based optical flow methods, which have substantially improved motion estimation accuracy compared to classical methods, can be effectively transferred to polar remote sensing. Optical flow produces spatially continuous drift fields, providing motion estimates for every image pixel rather than at sparse buoy locations, offering new opportunities for navigation and climate modeling.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.
Builds on
16 of 47 references.
References · 16
- 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,385
- 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,054
- 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 966
- 2016FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networkscited by 780
- 2021GMFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Global Matchingcited by 324
- 2022FlowFormer: A Transformer Architecture for Optical Flowcited by 273
- 2022Unifying Flow, Stereo and Depth Estimationcited by 270
- 2023Spring: A High-Resolution High-Detail Dataset and Benchmark for Scene Flow, Optical Flow and Stereocited by 170
- 2024SEA-RAFT: Simple, Efficient, Accurate RAFT for Optical Flowcited by 169
- 2022Global Matching with Overlapping Attention for Optical Flow Estimationcited by 64
- 2022DIP: Deep Inverse Patchmatch for High-Resolution Optical Flowcited by 40
- 2025WAFT: Warping-Alone Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 32
4 more
- 2025DPFlow: Adaptive Optical Flow Estimation with a Dual-Pyramid Frameworkcited by 30
- 2022Learning sparse features can lead to overfitting in neural networkscited by 23
- 2022Lagrangian Motion Magnification with Double Sparse Optical Flow Decompositioncited by 7
- 2025MEMFOF: High-Resolution Training for Memory-Efficient Multi-Frame Optical Flow Estimationcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.