LASTIST: LArge-Scale Target-Independent STance dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Stance detection has emerged as an area of research in the field of artificial intelligence. However, most research is currently centered on the target-dependent stance detection task, which is based on a person's stance in favor of or against a specific target. Furthermore, most benchmark datasets are based on English, making it difficult to develop models in low-resource languages such as Korean, especially for an emerging field such as stance detection. This study proposes the LArge-Scale Target-Independent STance (LASTIST) dataset to fill this research gap. Collected from the press releases of both parties on Korean political parties, the LASTIST dataset uses 563,299 labeled Korean sentences. We provide a detailed description of how we collected and constructed the dataset and trained state-of-the-art deep learning and stance detection models. Our LASTIST dataset is designed for various tasks in stance detection, including target-independent stance detection and diachronic evolution stance detection. We deploy our dataset on https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LASTIST-3721/.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2025.
Builds on
12 of 24 references.
References · 12
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Stance Detection on Social Media: State of the Art and Trendscited by 93
- 2016Stance and Sentiment in Tweetscited by 62
- 2020Will-They-Won't-They: A Very Large Dataset for Stance Detection on Twittercited by 53
- 2020Stance Prediction and Claim Verification: An Arabic Perspectivecited by 25
- 2021Small-Text: Active Learning for Text Classification in Pythoncited by 18
- 2024A Challenge Dataset and Effective Models for Conversational Stance Detectioncited by 17
- 2023Automated stance detection in complex topics and small languages: the challenging case of immigration in polarizing news mediacited by 14
- 2017Trump vs. Hillary: What went Viral during the 2016 US Presidential Electioncited by 8
- 2024Reading Between the Tweets: Deciphering Ideological Stances of Interconnected Mixed-Ideology Communitiescited by 7
- 2024ORCHID: A Chinese Debate Corpus for Target-Independent Stance Detection and Argumentative Dialogue Summarizationcited by 6
- 2025What's in the News? Towards Identification of Bias by Commission, Omission, and Source Selection (COSS)cited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.