mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Lipschitz-aware Linearity Grafting for Certified Robustness

arXiv 2510.25130 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Lipschitz constant is a fundamental property in certified robustness, as smaller values imply robustness to adversarial examples when a model is confident in its prediction. However, identifying the worst-case adversarial examples is known to be an NP-complete problem. Although over-approximation methods have shown success in neural network verification to address this challenge, reducing approximation errors remains a significant obstacle. Furthermore, these approximation errors hinder the ability to obtain tight local Lipschitz constants, which are crucial for certified robustness. Originally, grafting linearity into non-linear activation functions was proposed to reduce the number of unstable neurons, enabling scalable and complete verification. However, no prior theoretical analysis has explained how linearity grafting improves certified robustness. We instead consider linearity grafting primarily as a means of eliminating approximation errors rather than reducing the number of unstable neurons, since linear functions do not require relaxation. In this paper, we provide two theoretical contributions: 1) why linearity grafting improves certified robustness through the lens of the l_∞ local Lipschitz constant, and 2) grafting linearity into non-linear activation functions, the dominant source of approximation errors, yields a tighter local Lipschitz constant. Based on these theoretical contributions, we propose a Lipschitz-aware linearity grafting method that removes dominant approximation errors, which are crucial for tightening the local Lipschitz constant, thereby improving certified robustness, even without certified training. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that grafting linearity into these influential activations tightens the l_∞ local Lipschitz constant and enhances certified robustness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2025.

Builds on

42 of 56 references.

References · 42

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  4. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  5. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  6. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  7. 2017Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 702
  8. 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 599
  9. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  10. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
  11. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 328
  12. 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 306
30 more
  1. 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 255
  2. 2017NISP: Pruning Networks using Neuron Importance Score Propagationcited by 228
  3. 2021Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verificationcited by 228
  4. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 214
  5. 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 205
  6. 2020Fast and Complete: Enabling Complete Neural Network Verification with Rapid and Massively Parallel Incomplete Verifierscited by 187
  7. 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 182
  8. 2020Exactly Computing the Local Lipschitz Constant of ReLU Networkscited by 102
  9. 2019Adversarial Robustness vs Model Compression, or Both?cited by 98
  10. 2021The Second International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2021): Summary and Resultscited by 71
  11. 2018Training for Faster Adversarial Robustness Verification via Inducing ReLU Stabilitycited by 67
  12. 2020Enabling certification of verification-agnostic networks via memory-efficient semidefinite programmingcited by 66
  13. 2021Training Certifiably Robust Neural Networks with Efficient Local Lipschitz Boundscited by 65
  14. 2022Rethinking Lipschitz Neural Networks and Certified Robustness: A Boolean Function Perspectivecited by 51
  15. 2024Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-Bound for General Nonlinearitiescited by 47
  16. 2021Fast Certified Robust Training with Short Warmupcited by 46
  17. 2022Efficiently Computing Local Lipschitz Constants of Neural Networks via Bound Propagationcited by 45
  18. 2021Improved Branch and Bound for Neural Network Verification via Lagrangian Decompositioncited by 44
  19. 2022Prior-Guided Adversarial Initialization for Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 35
  20. 2018RecurJac: An Efficient Recursive Algorithm for Bounding Jacobian Matrix of Neural Networks and Its Applicationscited by 27
  21. 2023Understanding Certified Training with Interval Bound Propagationcited by 26
  22. 2023Expressive Losses for Verified Robustness via Convex Combinationscited by 23
  23. 2022IBP Regularization for Verified Adversarial Robustness via Branch-and-Boundcited by 21
  24. 2021Pruning and Slicing Neural Networks using Formal Verificationcited by 20
  25. 2022Can pruning improve certified robustness of neural networks?cited by 14
  26. 2024CTBENCH: A Library and Benchmark for Certified Trainingcited by 14
  27. 2024Preventing Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Training: A Bi-level Optimization Perspectivecited by 13
  28. 2022Linearity Grafting: Relaxed Neuron Pruning Helps Certifiable Robustnesscited by 10
  29. 2022Robust Binary Models by Pruning Randomly-initialized Networkscited by 5
  30. 2024Holistic Adversarially Robust Pruningcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.