mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Efficiency Without Cognitive Change: Evidence from Human Interaction with Narrow AI Systems

arXiv 2510.24893 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2025cs.HC cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into human cognition raises a fundamental question: does AI merely improve efficiency, or does it alter how we think? This study experimentally tested whether short-term exposure to narrow AI tools enhances core cognitive abilities or simply optimizes task performance. Thirty young adults completed standardized neuropsychological assessments embedded in a seven-week protocol with a four-week online intervention involving problem-solving and verbal comprehension tasks, either with or without AI support (ChatGPT). While AI-assisted participants completed several tasks faster and more accurately, no significant pre-post differences emerged in standardized measures of problem solving or verbal comprehension. These results demonstrate efficiency gains without cognitive change, suggesting that current narrow AI systems serve as cognitive scaffolds extending performance without transforming underlying mental capacities. The findings highlight the need for ethical and educational frameworks that promote critical and autonomous thinking in an increasingly AI-augmented cognitive ecology.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2025.

Builds on

0 of 14 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.