mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Methodology for Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Survival Analysis

arXiv 2510.24473 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study presents a comparative methodological analysis of six machine learning models for survival analysis (MLSA). Using data from nearly 45,000 colorectal cancer patients in the Hospital-Based Cancer Registries of S~ao Paulo, we evaluated Random Survival Forest (RSF), Gradient Boosting for Survival Analysis (GBSA), Survival SVM (SSVM), XGBoost-Cox (XGB-Cox), XGBoost-AFT (XGB-AFT), and LightGBM (LGBM), capable of predicting survival considering censored data. Hyperparameter optimization was performed with different samplers, and model performance was assessed using the Concordance Index (C-Index), C-Index IPCW, time-dependent AUC, and Integrated Brier Score (IBS). Survival curves produced by the models were compared with predictions from classification algorithms, and predictor interpretation was conducted using SHAP and permutation importance. XGB-AFT achieved the best performance (C-Index = 0.7618; IPCW = 0.7532), followed by GBSA and RSF. The results highlight the potential and applicability of MLSA to improve survival prediction and support decision making.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2025.

Builds on

2 of 7 references.

References · 2

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2017Machine Learning for Survival Analysis: A Surveycited by 112

Built on by

Not cited yet.