mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SymMaP: Improving Computational Efficiency in Linear Solvers through Symbolic Preconditioning

arXiv 2510.24170 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2025math.NA cs.AI cs.NAcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Matrix preconditioning is a critical technique to accelerate the solution of linear systems, where performance heavily depends on the selection of preconditioning parameters. Traditional parameter selection approaches often define fixed constants for specific scenarios. However, they rely on domain expertise and fail to consider the instance-wise features for individual problems, limiting their performance. In contrast, machine learning (ML) approaches, though promising, are hindered by high inference costs and limited interpretability. To combine the strengths of both approaches, we propose a symbolic discovery framework-namely, Symbolic Matrix Preconditioning (SymMaP)-to learn efficient symbolic expressions for preconditioning parameters. Specifically, we employ a neural network to search the high-dimensional discrete space for expressions that can accurately predict the optimal parameters. The learned expression allows for high inference efficiency and excellent interpretability (expressed in concise symbolic formulas), making it simple and reliable for deployment. Experimental results show that SymMaP consistently outperforms traditional strategies across various benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2025.

Builds on

25 of 69 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  3. 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 423
  4. 2021Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spacescited by 413
  5. 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 335
  6. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  7. 2019Deep Learning for Symbolic Mathematicscited by 266
  8. 2022U-NO: U-shaped Neural Operatorscited by 219
  9. 2014Learning to Executecited by 105
  10. 2019Learning to Optimize Multigrid PDE Solverscited by 79
  11. 2019Learning Neural PDE Solvers with Convergence Guaranteescited by 77
  12. 2020Learning Algebraic Multigrid Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 54
13 more
  1. 2025OptiTree: Hierarchical Thoughts Generation with Tree Search for LLM Optimization Modelingcited by 23
  2. 2021Optimization-Based Algebraic Multigrid Coarsening Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  3. 2023Neural incomplete factorization: learning preconditioners for the conjugate gradient methodcited by 18
  4. 2024MILP-StuDio: MILP Instance Generation via Block Structure Decompositioncited by 17
  5. 2025Apollo-MILP: An Alternating Prediction-Correction Neural Solving Framework for Mixed-Integer Linear Programmingcited by 16
  6. 2018Weakly-Supervised Deep Learning of Heat Transport via Physics Informed Losscited by 15
  7. 2024Accelerating PDE Data Generation via Differential Operator Action in Solution Spacecited by 15
  8. 2024Learning from Linear Algebra: A Graph Neural Network Approach to Preconditioner Design for Conjugate Gradient Solverscited by 13
  9. 2023Promoting Generalization for Exact Solvers via Adversarial Instance Augmentationcited by 12
  10. 2024Accelerating Data Generation for Neural Operators via Krylov Subspace Recyclingcited by 12
  11. 2024Deep Symbolic Optimization for Combinatorial Optimization: Accelerating Node Selection by Discovering Potential Heuristicscited by 8
  12. 2024Machine Learning Insides OptVerse AI Solver: Design Principles and Applicationscited by 7
  13. 2025Exploiting Edited Large Language Models as General Scientific Optimizerscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.