mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Direct Debiased Machine Learning via Bregman Divergence Minimization

arXiv 2510.23534 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2025econ.EM cs.LG math.STcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We develop a direct debiased machine learning framework comprising Neyman targeted estimation and generalized Riesz regression. Our framework unifies Riesz regression for automatic debiased machine learning, covariate balancing, targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), and density-ratio estimation. In many problems involving causal effects or structural models, the parameters of interest depend on regression functions. Plugging regression functions estimated by machine learning methods into the identifying equations can yield poor performance because of first-stage bias. To reduce such bias, debiased machine learning employs Neyman orthogonal estimating equations. Debiased machine learning typically requires estimation of the Riesz representer and the regression function. For this problem, we develop a direct debiased machine learning framework with an end-to-end algorithm. We formulate estimation of the nuisance parameters, the regression function and the Riesz representer, as minimizing the discrepancy between Neyman orthogonal scores computed with known and unknown nuisance parameters, which we refer to as Neyman targeted estimation. Neyman targeted estimation includes Riesz representer estimation, and we measure discrepancies using the Bregman divergence. The Bregman divergence encompasses various loss functions as special cases, where the squared loss yields Riesz regression and the Kullback-Leibler divergence yields entropy balancing. We refer to this Riesz representer estimation as generalized Riesz regression. Neyman targeted estimation also yields TMLE as a special case for regression function estimation. Furthermore, for specific pairs of models and Riesz representer estimation methods, we can automatically obtain the covariate balancing property without explicitly solving the covariate balancing objective.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2025.

Builds on

13 of 50 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
  2. 2020Telescoping Density-Ratio Estimationcited by 108
  3. 2020Rethinking Importance Weighting for Deep Learning under Distribution Shiftcited by 93
  4. 2020Non-Negative Bregman Divergence Minimization for Deep Direct Density Ratio Estimationcited by 45
  5. 2016Covariate Balancing Propensity Score by Tailored Loss Functionscited by 34
  6. 2020Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning for External Validity under a Covariate Shiftcited by 26
  7. 2023Augmented balancing weights as linear regressioncited by 21
  8. 2023Automatic Debiased Machine Learning for Covariate Shiftscited by 16
  9. 2016Kernel Balancing: A flexible non-parametric weighting procedure for estimating causal effectscited by 9
  10. 2025Direct Bias-Correction Term Estimation for Average Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 9
  11. 2021Learning Causal Models from Conditional Moment Restrictions by Importance Weightingcited by 7
  12. 2023Double Debiased Covariate Shift Adaptation Robust to Density-Ratio Estimationcited by 6
1 more
  1. 2021Density-Ratio Based Personalised Ranking from Implicit Feedbackcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5.

5 papers.