mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Self-Calibrated Consistency can Fight Back for Adversarial Robustness in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2510.22785 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 3

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP have demonstrated strong zero-shot capabilities across diverse domains, yet remain highly vulnerable to adversarial perturbations that disrupt image-text alignment and compromise reliability. Existing defenses typically rely on adversarial fine-tuning with labeled data, limiting their applicability in zero-shot settings. In this work, we identify two key weaknesses of current CLIP adversarial attacks -- lack of semantic guidance and vulnerability to view variations -- collectively termed semantic and viewpoint fragility. To address these challenges, we propose Self-Calibrated Consistency (SCC), an effective test-time defense. SCC consists of two complementary modules: Semantic consistency, which leverages soft pseudo-labels from counterattack warm-up and multi-view predictions to regularize cross-modal alignment and separate the target embedding from confusable negatives; and Spatial consistency, aligning perturbed visual predictions via augmented views to stabilize inference under adversarial perturbations. Together, these modules form a plug-and-play inference strategy. Extensive experiments on 22 benchmarks under diverse attack settings show that SCC consistently improves the zero-shot robustness of CLIP while maintaining accuracy, and can be seamlessly integrated with other VLMs for further gains. These findings highlight the great potential of establishing an adversarially robust paradigm from CLIP, with implications extending to broader vision-language domains such as BioMedCLIP.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 35 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2025.

Builds on

35 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025R-TPT: Improving Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Test-Time Prompt Tuning15 Apr
  2. 2025Robust-LLaVA: On the Effectiveness of Large-Scale Robust Image Encoders for Multi-modal Large Language Models3 Feb
  3. 2024Text-Guided Attention is All You Need for Zero-Shot Robustness in Vision-Language Models29 Oct
  4. 2024One Prompt Word is Enough to Boost Adversarial Robustness for Pre-trained Vision-Language Models4 Mar
  5. 2024Pre-trained Model Guided Fine-Tuning for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness9 Jan
  6. 2022Understanding Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models14 Dec

Other references · 29

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,588
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,379
  3. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,992
  4. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,709
  5. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,492
  6. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,431
  7. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 782
  8. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 684
  9. 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 664
  10. 2021Extract Free Dense Labels from CLIPcited by 582
  11. 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 581
  12. 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 499
17 more
  1. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 381
  2. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 355
  3. 2023A Simple Framework for Open-Vocabulary Segmentation and Detectioncited by 197
  4. 2022VLP: A Survey on Vision-Language Pre-trainingcited by 159
  5. 2022ReCo: Retrieve and Co-segment for Zero-shot Transfercited by 116
  6. 2023Align Your Prompts: Test-Time Prompting with Distribution Alignment for Zero-Shot Generalizationcited by 101
  7. 2022Exploiting Unlabeled Data with Vision and Language Models for Object Detectioncited by 97
  8. 2024On the test-time zero-shot generalization of vision-language models: Do we really need prompt learning?cited by 67
  9. 2021COVID-19 Infection Localization and Severity Grading from Chest X-ray Imagescited by 46
  10. 2024Just Shift It: Test-Time Prototype Shifting for Zero-Shot Generalization with Vision-Language Modelscited by 32
  11. 2021Attacking Adversarial Attacks as A Defensecited by 31
  12. 2024BiomedCoOp: Learning to Prompt for Biomedical Vision-Language Modelscited by 28
  13. 2021Combating Adversaries with Anti-Adversariescited by 27
  14. 2025CLIP is Strong Enough to Fight Back: Test-time Counterattacks towards Zero-shot Adversarial Robustness of CLIPcited by 23
  15. 2023Benchmarking Test-Time Adaptation against Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 17
  16. 2025KPL: Training-Free Medical Knowledge Mining of Vision-Language Modelscited by 10
  17. 2025Fair-MoE: Fairness-Oriented Mixture of Experts in Vision-Language Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Robustifying Vision-Language Models via Test-Time Prompt Adaptation
  2. 2025Navigating the Trade-off: A Synthesis of Defensive Strategies for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026Corrupted but Correct: Why Vision-Language Models Lie to Themselves Internally
  4. 2026Beyond False Stability: High-Noise Drift Gating for Test-Time Adversarial Defenses in Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Adversarial Attacks Already Tell the Answer: Directional Bias-Guided Test-time Defense for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026Beyond Standard Benchmarks: A Systematic Audit of Vision-Language Model's Robustness to Natural Semantic Variation Across Diverse Tasks
  7. 2025Double Visual Defense: Adversarial Pre-training and Instruction Tuning for Improving Vision-Language Model Robustness
  8. 2026SS-TPT: Stability and Suitability-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models