Concentration and excess risk bounds for imbalanced classification with synthetic oversampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Synthetic oversampling of minority examples using SMOTE and its variants is a leading strategy for addressing imbalanced classification problems. Despite the success of this approach in practice, its theoretical foundations remain underexplored. We develop a theoretical framework to analyze the behavior of SMOTE and related methods when classifiers are trained on synthetic data. We first derive a uniform concentration bound on the discrepancy between the empirical risk over synthetic minority samples and the population risk on the true minority distribution. We then provide a nonparametric excess risk guarantee for kernel-based classifiers trained using such synthetic data. These results lead to practical guidelines for better parameter tuning of both SMOTE and the downstream learning algorithm. Numerical experiments are provided to illustrate and support the theoretical findings
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.
Builds on
15 of 50 references.
References · 15
- 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
- 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 290
- 2016Imbalanced-learn: A Python Toolbox to Tackle the Curse of Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learningcited by 195
- 2020Class-Weighted Classification: Trade-offs and Robust Approachescited by 30
- 2019LoRAS: An oversampling approach for imbalanced datasetscited by 15
- 2019Kernel density estimation based sampling for imbalanced class distributioncited by 13
- 2017Achieving the time of 1-NN, but the accuracy of k-NNcited by 10
- 2020Logistic Regression for Massive Data with Rare Eventscited by 9
- 2020Imbalanced classification: a paradigm-based reviewcited by 5
- 2023Nearest Neighbor Sampling for Covariate Shift Adaptationcited by 5
- 2024Do we need rebalancing strategies? A theoretical and empirical study around SMOTE and its variantscited by 5
- 2023Sharp error bounds for imbalanced classification: how many examples in the minority class?cited by 4
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Bias-Corrected Data Synthesis for Imbalanced Learningcited by 6
- 2026Synthetic Augmentation in Imbalanced Learning: When It Helps, When It Hurts, and How Much to Addcited by 3
- 2026When Does Synthetic Data Augmentation Improve Score-Based Imbalanced Classification?cited by 0
- 2026Synthetic minority data is redundant or invalid: a data-dependent validity theory and a de-biased testcited by 0
- 2026Synthetic minority data is redundant or invalid: a data-dependent validity theory and a de-biased test22 Jul 2026
- 2026When Does Synthetic Data Augmentation Improve Score-Based Imbalanced Classification?24 Jun 2026
- 2026Synthetic Augmentation in Imbalanced Learning: When It Helps, When It Hurts, and How Much to Add22 Jan 2026
- 2025Bias-Corrected Data Synthesis for Imbalanced Learning30 Oct 2025