mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Mitigating representation bias caused by missing pixels in methane plume detection

arXiv 2510.19478 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most satellite images have systematically missing pixels (i.e., missing data not at random (MNAR)) due to factors such as clouds. If not addressed, these missing pixels can lead to representation bias in automated feature extraction models. In this work, we show that spurious association between the label and the number of missing values in methane plume detection can cause the model to associate the coverage (i.e., the percentage of valid pixels in an image) with the label, subsequently under-detecting plumes in low-coverage images. We evaluate multiple imputation approaches to remove the dependence between the coverage and a label. Additionally, we propose a weighted resampling scheme during training that removes the association between the label and the coverage by enforcing class balance in each coverage bin. Our results show that both resampling and imputation can significantly reduce the representation bias without hurting balanced accuracy, precision, or recall. Finally, we evaluate the capability of the debiased models using these techniques in an operational scenario and demonstrate that the debiased models have a higher chance of detecting plumes in low-coverage images.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2025.

Builds on

3 of 18 references.

References · 3

  1. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  2. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
  3. 2022Detecting Shortcut Learning for Fair Medical AI using Shortcut Testingcited by 52

Built on by

Not cited yet.