FairNet: Dynamic Fairness Correction without Performance Loss via Contrastive Conditional LoRA
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring fairness in machine learning models is a critical challenge. Existing debiasing methods often compromise performance, rely on static correction strategies, and struggle with data sparsity, particularly within minority groups. Furthermore, their utilization of sensitive attributes is often suboptimal, either depending excessively on complete attribute labeling or disregarding these attributes entirely. To overcome these limitations, we propose FairNet, a novel framework for dynamic, instance-level fairness correction. FairNet integrates a bias detector with conditional low-rank adaptation (LoRA), which enables selective activation of the fairness correction mechanism exclusively for instances identified as biased, and thereby preserve performance on unbiased instances. A key contribution is a new contrastive loss function for training the LoRA module, specifically designed to minimize intra-class representation disparities across different sensitive groups and effectively address underfitting in minority groups. The FairNet framework can flexibly handle scenarios with complete, partial, or entirely absent sensitive attribute labels. Theoretical analysis confirms that, under moderate TPR/FPR for the bias detector, FairNet can enhance the performance of the worst group without diminishing overall model performance, and potentially yield slight performance improvements. Comprehensive empirical evaluations across diverse vision and language benchmarks validate the effectiveness of FairNet.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2025.
Builds on
22 of 38 references.
References · 22
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
10 more
- 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
- 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
- 2022Fair and Optimal Classification via Post-Processingcited by 50
- 2021Group-Aware Threshold Adaptation for Fair Classificationcited by 21
- 2024Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspectivecited by 10
- 2024How does promoting the minority fraction affect generalization? A theoretical study of the one-hidden-layer neural network on group imbalancecited by 6
- 2023A Theoretical Approach to Characterize the Accuracy-Fairness Trade-off Pareto Frontiercited by 4
- 2025Sebra: Debiasing Through Self-Guided Bias Rankingcited by 4
- 2024Applying Intrinsic Debiasing on Downstream Tasks: Challenges and Considerations for Machine Translationcited by 2
- 2024Enhancing Fairness through Reweighting: A Path to Attain the Sufficiency Rulecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.