mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Transformers are Inherently Succinct

arXiv 2510.19315 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2025cs.FL cs.LG cs.LOcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study succinctness as a measure of the expressive power of transformers. Succinctness -- how compactly a formalism can describe a language relative to other formalisms -- is a classical notion in logic and automata theory. We prove that fixed-precision transformers are remarkably succinct: they can be exponentially more succinct than both linear temporal logic (LTL) and recurrent neural networks, and, by extension, state-space models, and doubly exponentially more succinct than finite automata. In other words, there exist families of languages describable by polynomial-size transformers whose smallest equivalent LTL formula or recurrent neural network is exponentially large, and whose smallest equivalent automaton is doubly exponentially large. We also establish matching upper bounds, showing that any fixed-precision transformer can be converted to an LTL formula with at most an exponential blow-up -- improving a prior doubly exponential translation. As a consequence of this succinctness, we show that basic verification problems for transformers, such as emptiness and equivalence, are provably intractable: specifically, EXPSPACE-complete.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2025.

Builds on

20 of 45 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  3. 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 715
  4. 2019Theoretical Limitations of Self-Attention in Neural Sequence Modelscited by 288
  5. 2023What Algorithms can Transformers Learn? A Study in Length Generalizationcited by 199
  6. 2024The Illusion of State in State-Space Modelscited by 187
  7. 2023What Formal Languages Can Transformers Express? A Surveycited by 124
  8. 2018On the Practical Computational Power of Finite Precision RNNs for Language Recognitioncited by 117
  9. 2022Overcoming a Theoretical Limitation of Self-Attentioncited by 113
  10. 2022Formal Language Recognition by Hard Attention Transformers: Perspectives from Circuit Complexitycited by 93
  11. 2020A Formal Hierarchy of RNN Architecturescited by 62
  12. 2023Masked Hard-Attention Transformers Recognize Exactly the Star-Free Languagescited by 49
8 more
  1. 2024A Formal Framework for Understanding Length Generalization in Transformerscited by 45
  2. 2024The Fifth International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2024): Summary and Resultscited by 43
  3. 2023Logical Languages Accepted by Transformer Encoders with Hard Attentioncited by 38
  4. 2025Characterizing the Expressivity of Fixed-Precision Transformer Language Modelscited by 14
  5. 2025Unique Hard Attention: A Tale of Two Sidescited by 10
  6. 2025The Counting Power of Transformerscited by 9
  7. 2025Analyzing limits for in-context learningcited by 6
  8. 2024Transformer Encoder Satisfiability: Complexity and Impact on Formal Reasoningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022A Logic for Expressing Log-Precision Transformers
  2. 2026On the Expressiveness of State Space Models via Temporal Logics
  3. 2026Towards Verifiable Transformers: Solver-Checkable Circuit Explanations
  4. 2022Transformers Learn Shortcuts to Automata
  5. 2026Fixed Universal Transformers
  6. 2026Barriers to Universal Reasoning With Transformers (And How to Overcome Them)
  7. 2025A Little Depth Goes a Long Way: The Expressive Power of Log-Depth Transformers
  8. 2026Protoreasoning in Tiny Transformers