mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Investigating Demographic Bias in Brain MRI Segmentation: A Comparative Study of Deep-Learning and Non-Deep-Learning Methods

arXiv 2510.17999 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep-learning-based segmentation algorithms have substantially advanced the field of medical image analysis, particularly in structural delineations in MRIs. However, an important consideration is the intrinsic bias in the data. Concerns about unfairness, such as performance disparities based on sensitive attributes like race and sex, are increasingly urgent. In this work, we evaluate the results of three different segmentation models (UNesT, nnU-Net, and CoTr) and a traditional atlas-based method (ANTs), applied to segment the left and right nucleus accumbens (NAc) in MRI images. We utilize a dataset including four demographic subgroups: black female, black male, white female, and white male. We employ manually labeled gold-standard segmentations to train and test segmentation models. This study consists of two parts: the first assesses the segmentation performance of models, while the second measures the volumes they produce to evaluate the effects of race, sex, and their interaction. Fairness is quantitatively measured using a metric designed to quantify fairness in segmentation performance. Additionally, linear mixed models analyze the impact of demographic variables on segmentation accuracy and derived volumes. Training on the same race as the test subjects leads to significantly better segmentation accuracy for some models. ANTs and UNesT show notable improvements in segmentation accuracy when trained and tested on race-matched data, unlike nnU-Net, which demonstrates robust performance independent of demographic matching. Finally, we examine sex and race effects on the volume of the NAc using segmentations from the manual rater and from our biased models. Results reveal that the sex effects observed with manual segmentation can also be observed with biased models, whereas the race effects disappear in all but one model.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.

Builds on

7 of 29 references.

References · 7

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  2. 2021CoTr: Efficiently Bridging CNN and Transformer for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 227
  3. 2019FastSurfer -- A fast and accurate deep learning based neuroimaging pipelinecited by 112
  4. 2021Fairness in Cardiac MR Image Analysis: An Investigation of Bias Due to Data Imbalance in Deep Learning Based Segmentationcited by 57
  5. 2022Addressing Fairness Issues in Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Reviewcited by 28
  6. 2022A Study of Demographic Bias in CNN-based Brain MR Segmentationcited by 16
  7. 2023An investigation into the impact of deep learning model choice on sex and race bias in cardiac MR segmentationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.