SimBA: Simplifying Benchmark Analysis Using Performance Matrices Alone
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern language models are evaluated on large benchmarks, which are difficult to make sense of, especially for model selection. Looking at the raw evaluation numbers themselves using a model-centric lens, we propose SimBA, a three phase framework to Simplify Benchmark Analysis. The three phases of SimBA are: stalk, where we conduct dataset & model comparisons, prowl, where we discover a representative subset, and pounce, where we use the representative subset to predict performance on a held-out set of models. Applying SimBA to three popular LM benchmarks: HELM, MMLU, and BigBenchLite reveals that across all three benchmarks, datasets and models relate strongly to one another (stalk). We develop an representative set discovery algorithm which covers a benchmark using raw evaluation scores alone. Using our algorithm, we find that with 6.25% (1/16), 1.7% (1/58), and 28.4% (21/74) of the datasets for HELM, MMLU, and BigBenchLite respectively, we achieve coverage levels of at least 95% (prowl). Additionally, using just these representative subsets, we can both preserve model ranks and predict performance on a held-out set of models with near zero mean-squared error (pounce). Taken together, SimBA can help model developers improve efficiency during model training and dataset creators validate whether their newly created dataset differs from existing datasets in a benchmark. Our code is open source, available at https://github.com/nishantsubramani/simba.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.
Builds on
15 of 33 references.
References · 15
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 310
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 274
- 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 132
- 2023Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examplescited by 86
- 2023Efficient Benchmarking of Language Modelscited by 71
- 2023Evaluating Evaluation Metrics: A Framework for Analyzing NLG Evaluation Metrics using Measurement Theorycited by 43
- 2025DataDecide: How to Predict Best Pretraining Data with Small Experimentscited by 40
- 2023How Predictable Are Large Language Model Capabilities? A Case Study on BIG-benchcited by 34
- 2025A Coreset Selection of Coreset Selection Literature: Introduction and Recent Advancescited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026Efficient Benchmarking of AI Agentscited by 10
- 2026Offline Preference-Based Trajectory Evaluationcited by 2
- 2026Coresets Before Score Sets: Evaluation-Unsupervised Prompt Subset Selection for LLM Benchmarkscited by 2
- 2026The ACUTE Protocol: Operationalizing Language Model Activations for Better Calibration, Utility, and Trustcited by 1
- 2026Harnessing the Latent Space: From Steering Vectors to Model Calibrators for Control and Trustcited by 0
- 2026Are We Testing Too Much? A Survey of Benchmark Compression for Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Are We Testing Too Much? A Survey of Benchmark Compression for Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models13 Oct 2026
- 2026Coresets Before Score Sets: Evaluation-Unsupervised Prompt Subset Selection for LLM Benchmarks2 Jul 2026
- 2026Harnessing the Latent Space: From Steering Vectors to Model Calibrators for Control and Trust30 Jun 2026
- 2026Offline Preference-Based Trajectory Evaluation16 Jun 2026
- 2026The ACUTE Protocol: Operationalizing Language Model Activations for Better Calibration, Utility, and Trust5 Jun 2026
- 2026Efficient Benchmarking of AI Agents24 Mar 2026