mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SimBA: Simplifying Benchmark Analysis Using Performance Matrices Alone

arXiv 2510.17998 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern language models are evaluated on large benchmarks, which are difficult to make sense of, especially for model selection. Looking at the raw evaluation numbers themselves using a model-centric lens, we propose SimBA, a three phase framework to Simplify Benchmark Analysis. The three phases of SimBA are: stalk, where we conduct dataset & model comparisons, prowl, where we discover a representative subset, and pounce, where we use the representative subset to predict performance on a held-out set of models. Applying SimBA to three popular LM benchmarks: HELM, MMLU, and BigBenchLite reveals that across all three benchmarks, datasets and models relate strongly to one another (stalk). We develop an representative set discovery algorithm which covers a benchmark using raw evaluation scores alone. Using our algorithm, we find that with 6.25% (1/16), 1.7% (1/58), and 28.4% (21/74) of the datasets for HELM, MMLU, and BigBenchLite respectively, we achieve coverage levels of at least 95% (prowl). Additionally, using just these representative subsets, we can both preserve model ranks and predict performance on a held-out set of models with near zero mean-squared error (pounce). Taken together, SimBA can help model developers improve efficiency during model training and dataset creators validate whether their newly created dataset differs from existing datasets in a benchmark. Our code is open source, available at https://github.com/nishantsubramani/simba.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.

Builds on

15 of 33 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  2. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  3. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
  4. 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 310
  5. 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 274
  6. 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 132
  7. 2023Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examplescited by 86
  8. 2023Efficient Benchmarking of Language Modelscited by 71
  9. 2023Evaluating Evaluation Metrics: A Framework for Analyzing NLG Evaluation Metrics using Measurement Theorycited by 43
  10. 2025DataDecide: How to Predict Best Pretraining Data with Small Experimentscited by 40
  11. 2023How Predictable Are Large Language Model Capabilities? A Case Study on BIG-benchcited by 34
  12. 2025A Coreset Selection of Coreset Selection Literature: Introduction and Recent Advancescited by 28
3 more
  1. 2025How to Select Datapoints for Efficient Human Evaluation of NLG Models?cited by 23
  2. 2025MICE for CATs: Model-Internal Confidence Estimation for Calibrating Agents with Toolscited by 15
  3. 2024Chasing Random: Instruction Selection Strategies Fail to Generalizecited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.