mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DeepEye-SQL: A Software-Engineering-Inspired Text-to-SQL Framework

arXiv 2510.17586 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2025cs.DBcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have advanced Text-to-SQL, yet existing solutions still fall short of system-level reliability. The limitation is not merely in individual modules -- e.g., schema linking, reasoning, and verification -- but more critically in the lack of structured orchestration that enforces correctness across the entire workflow. This gap motivates a paradigm shift: treating Text-to-SQL not as free-form language generation but as a software-engineering problem that demands structured, verifiable orchestration. We present DeepEye-SQL, a software-engineering-inspired framework that reframes Text-to-SQL as the development of a small software program, executed through a verifiable process guided by the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). DeepEye-SQL integrates four synergistic stages: it grounds user intent through robust schema linking, enforcing relational closure; enhances fault tolerance with N-version SQL generation; ensures deterministic verification via a ``Syntax-Logic-Quality'' tool-chain that intercepts errors pre-execution; and introduces confidence-aware selection that leverages execution-guided adjudication to resolve ambiguity beyond simple majority voting. Leveraging open-source MoE LLMs (~30B total, ~3B activated parameters) without any fine-tuning, DeepEye-SQL achieves 73.5% execution accuracy on BIRD-Dev, 75.07% on the official BIRD-Test leaderboard, and 89.8% on Spider-Test, outperforming state-of-the-art solutions that rely on larger models or extensive training. This highlights that principled orchestration, rather than LLM scaling alone, is key to achieving system-level reliability in Text-to-SQL.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 24.

26 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025A Survey of Data Agents: Emerging Paradigm or Overstated Hype?cited by 30
  2. 2026AOrchestra: Automating Sub-Agent Creation for Agentic Orchestrationcited by 30
  3. 2025InteractComp: Evaluating Search Agents With Ambiguous Queriescited by 12
  4. 2026InfoPO: Information-Driven Policy Optimization for User-Centric Agentscited by 8
  5. 2026Harnessing Agentic Evolutioncited by 8
  6. 2026Memo-SQL: Structured Decomposition and Experience-Driven Self-Correction for Training-Free NL2SQLcited by 3
  7. 2026Text2GraphQuery-Bench: A Text to Graph Query Benchmarkcited by 3
  8. 2026FlexSQL: Flexible Exploration and Execution Make Better Text-to-SQL Agentscited by 3
  9. 2026DataSpace: Benchmarking Data Agents for Verifiable Analytics over Heterogeneous Workspacescited by 3
  10. 2026Unsupervised Skill Discovery for Agentic Data Analysiscited by 2
  11. 2026ErrorLLM: Modeling SQL Errors for Text-to-SQL Refinementcited by 1
  12. 2026SQLConductor: Search-to-Policy Learning for Step-wise Text-to-SQL Orchestrationcited by 1
14 more
  1. 2026IESR:Efficient MCTS-Based Modular Reasoning for Text-to-SQL with Large Language Modelscited by 0
  2. 2026Dial: A Knowledge-Grounded Dialect-Specific NL2SQL Systemcited by 0
  3. 2026ROSE: An Intent-Centered Evaluation Metric for NL2SQLcited by 0
  4. 2026SIRIUS-SQL: Anchoring Multi-Candidate Text-to-SQL in Execution Feedbackcited by 0
  5. 2026CAPER: Clause-Aligned Process Supervision for Text-to-SQLcited by 0
  6. 2026SOMA-SQL: Resolving Multi-Source Ambiguity in NL-to-SQL via Synthetic Log and Execution Probingcited by 0
  7. 2026DecoSearch: Complexity-Aware Routing and Plan-Level Repair for Text-to-SQLcited by 0
  8. 2026SERL-SQL: Selective Hindsight Distillation for Text-to-SQL Reinforcement Agentic Learningcited by 0
  9. 2026From Test-Time Scaling to Reusable Memory: Measuring Crystallization in Text-to-SQLcited by 0
  10. 2026DexterSQL: Deep Schema Exploration and Rule-based Correction for Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 0
  11. 2026Are These Modules Worth Their Cost? A Paradigm-Level Accuracy-Cost Analysis of In-context Learning Text-to-SQLcited by 0
  12. 2026Data Agents: Agentic Data Systemscited by 0
  13. 2026ModularSQL: A Runtime Guardrail for the Multiplicity Blind Spot in Text-to-SQLcited by 0
  14. 2026TQTS-Bench: A Multi-Syntax Benchmark for Text-to-Query over Time-Series Databasescited by 0