Click, Predict, Trust: Clinician-in-the-Loop AI Segmentation for Lung Cancer CT-Based Prognosis within the Knowledge-to-Action Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality, with CT imaging central to screening, prognosis, and treatment. Manual segmentation is variable and time-intensive, while deep learning (DL) offers automation but faces barriers to clinical adoption. Guided by the Knowledge-to-Action framework, this study develops a clinician-in-the-loop DL pipeline to enhance reproducibility, prognostic accuracy, and clinical trust. Multi-center CT data from 999 patients across 12 public datasets were analyzed using five DL models (3D Attention U-Net, ResUNet, VNet, ReconNet, SAM-Med3D), benchmarked against expert contours on whole and click-point cropped images. Segmentation reproducibility was assessed using 497 PySERA-extracted radiomic features via Spearman correlation, ICC, Wilcoxon tests, and MANOVA, while prognostic modeling compared supervised (SL) and semi-supervised learning (SSL) across 38 dimensionality reduction strategies and 24 classifiers. Six physicians qualitatively evaluated masks across seven domains, including clinical meaningfulness, boundary quality, prognostic value, trust, and workflow integration. VNet achieved the best performance (Dice = 0.83, IoU = 0.71), radiomic stability (mean correlation = 0.76, ICC = 0.65), and predictive accuracy under SSL (accuracy = 0.88, F1 = 0.83). SSL consistently outperformed SL across models. Radiologists favored VNet for peritumoral representation and smoother boundaries, preferring AI-generated initial masks for refinement rather than replacement. These results demonstrate that integrating VNet with SSL yields accurate, reproducible, and clinically trusted CT-based lung cancer prognosis, highlighting a feasible path toward physician-centered AI translation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2025.
Builds on
10 of 66 references.
References · 10
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
- 2022Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validationcited by 190
- 2018Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysiscited by 178
- 2017DeepIGeoS: A Deep Interactive Geodesic Framework for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 110
- 2023SAM-Med3D: Towards General-purpose Segmentation Models for Volumetric Medical Imagescited by 101
- 2019Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via Disentangled Representations: Application to Cross-Modality Liver Segmentationcited by 50
- 2021Brain Tumor Segmentation and Survival Prediction using 3D Attention UNetcited by 19
- 2025Calibration and Uncertainty for multiRater Volume Assessment in multiorgan Segmentation (CURVAS) challenge resultscited by 7
- 2025AllMetrics: A Unified Python Library for Standardized Metric Evaluation and Robust Data Validation in Machine Learningcited by 1
- 2025Robust Semi-Supervised CT Radiomics for Lung Cancer Prognosis: Cost-Effective Learning with Limited Labels and SHAP Interpretationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.