Predicting life satisfaction using machine learning and explainable AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Life satisfaction is a crucial facet of human well-being. Hence, research on life satisfaction is incumbent for understanding how individuals experience their lives and influencing interventions targeted at enhancing mental health and well-being. Life satisfaction has traditionally been measured using analog, complicated, and frequently error-prone methods. These methods raise questions concerning validation and propagation. However, this study demonstrates the potential for machine learning algorithms to predict life satisfaction with a high accuracy of 93.80% and a 73.00% macro F1-score. The dataset comes from a government survey of 19000 people aged 16-64 years in Denmark. Using feature learning techniques, 27 significant questions for assessing contentment were extracted, making the study highly reproducible, simple, and easily interpretable. Furthermore, clinical and biomedical large language models (LLMs) were explored for predicting life satisfaction by converting tabular data into natural language sentences through mapping and adding meaningful counterparts, achieving an accuracy of 93.74% and macro F1-score of 73.21%. It was found that life satisfaction prediction is more closely related to the biomedical domain than the clinical domain. Ablation studies were also conducted to understand the impact of data resampling and feature selection techniques on model performance. Moreover, the correlation between primary determinants with different age brackets was analyzed, and it was found that health condition is the most important determinant across all ages. This study demonstrates how machine learning, large language models and XAI can jointly contribute to building trust and understanding in using AI to investigate human behavior, with significant ramifications for academics and professionals working to quantify and comprehend subjective well-being.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2025.
Builds on
8 of 56 references.
References · 8
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
- 2019ClinicalBERT: Modeling Clinical Notes and Predicting Hospital Readmissioncited by 487
- 2019Gradio: Hassle-Free Sharing and Testing of ML Models in the Wildcited by 176
- 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challengescited by 143
- 2021Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integrationcited by 43
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Towards Transparent Mental Health Insights: An Explainable AI Model for Career-Related Depression and Anxiety Among University Students Using Structured Datacited by 0
- 2026Auditing Construct Overlap in Explainable Machine Learning: Evidence from Burnout-Depression Prediction Across Student Cohortscited by 0
- 2026Auditing Construct Overlap in Explainable Machine Learning: Evidence from Burnout-Depression Prediction Across Student Cohorts12 Jul 2026
- 2026Towards Transparent Mental Health Insights: An Explainable AI Model for Career-Related Depression and Anxiety Among University Students Using Structured Data19 Jun 2026