Declarative Techniques for NL Queries over Heterogeneous Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many industrial settings, users wish to ask questions in natural language, the answers to which require assembling information from diverse structured data sources. With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), applications can now translate natural language questions into a set of API calls or database calls, execute them, and combine the results into an appropriate natural language response. However, these applications remain impractical in realistic industrial settings because they do not cope with the data source heterogeneity that typifies such environments. In this work, we simulate the heterogeneity of real industry settings by introducing two extensions of the popular Spider benchmark dataset that require a combination of database and API calls. Then, we introduce a declarative approach to handling such data heterogeneity and demonstrate that it copes with data source heterogeneity significantly better than state-of-the-art LLM-based agentic or imperative code generation systems. Our augmented benchmarks are available to the research community.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2025.
Builds on
19 of 44 references.
References · 19
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
- 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
- 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
- 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 667
- 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 574
- 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agentscited by 537
- 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 378
- 2024Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflowscited by 223
- 2023An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Callingcited by 170
- 2025APIGen-MT: Agentic Pipeline for Multi-Turn Data Generation via Simulated Agent-Human Interplaycited by 158
7 more
- 2020Semantic Evaluation for Text-to-SQL with Distilled Test Suitescited by 123
- 2024Hammer: Robust Function-Calling for On-Device Language Models via Function Maskingcited by 53
- 2025ITBench: Evaluating AI Agents across Diverse Real-World IT Automation Taskscited by 48
- 2024NESTFUL: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Nested Sequences of API Callscited by 45
- 2025ReFoRCE: A Text-to-SQL Agent with Self-Refinement, Consensus Enforcement, and Column Explorationcited by 34
- 2024BlendSQL: A Scalable Dialect for Unifying Hybrid Question Answering in Relational Algebracited by 23
- 2024PreAct: Prediction Enhances Agent's Planning Abilitycited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Text2SQL is Not Enough: Unifying AI and Databases with TAG
- 2025Agentic LLMs for Question Answering over Tabular Data
- 2026Querying Structured Data Through Natural Language Using Language Models
- 2026Conversational Query Engine for Mixed-Modality Heterogeneous Enterprise Data Sources
- 2026GenDB: The Next Generation of Query Processing -- Synthesized, Not Engineered
- 2024Evaluating and Enhancing LLMs for Multi-turn Text-to-SQL with Multiple Question Types
- 2025BAPPA: Benchmarking Agents, Plans, and Pipelines for Automated Text-to-SQL Generation
- 2025MoNaCo: More Natural and Complex Questions for Reasoning Across Dozens of Documents