mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CrossRay3D: Geometry and Distribution Guidance for Efficient Multimodal 3D Detection

arXiv 2510.15991 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The sparse cross-modality detector offers more advantages than its counterpart, the Bird's-Eye-View (BEV) detector, particularly in terms of adaptability for downstream tasks and computational cost savings. However, existing sparse detectors overlook the quality of token representation, leaving it with a sub-optimal foreground quality and limited performance. In this paper, we identify that the geometric structure preserved and the class distribution are the key to improving the performance of the sparse detector, and propose a Sparse Selector (SS). The core module of SS is Ray-Aware Supervision (RAS), which preserves rich geometric information during the training stage, and Class-Balanced Supervision, which adaptively reweights the salience of class semantics, ensuring that tokens associated with small objects are retained during token sampling. Thereby, outperforming other sparse multi-modal detectors in the representation of tokens. Additionally, we design Ray Positional Encoding (Ray PE) to address the distribution differences between the LiDAR modality and the image. Finally, we integrate the aforementioned module into an end-to-end sparse multi-modality detector, dubbed CrossRay3D. Experiments show that, on the challenging nuScenes benchmark, CrossRay3D achieves state-of-the-art performance with 72.4 mAP and 74.7 NDS, while running 1.84 faster than other leading methods. Moreover, CrossRay3D demonstrates strong robustness even in scenarios where LiDAR or camera data are partially or entirely missing.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2025.

Builds on

54 of 84 references.

References · 54

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  4. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  5. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  6. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
  7. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
  8. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
  9. 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
  10. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,319
  11. 2022BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-Camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformerscited by 1,218
  12. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,144
38 more
  1. 2020Lift, Splat, Shoot: Encoding Images From Arbitrary Camera Rigs by Implicitly Unprojecting to 3Dcited by 1,044
  2. 2022BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representationcited by 850
  3. 2021BEVDet: High-performance Multi-camera 3D Object Detection in Bird-Eye-Viewcited by 713
  4. 2023Argoverse 2: Next Generation Datasets for Self-Driving Perception and Forecastingcited by 707
  5. 2021DETR3D: 3D Object Detection from Multi-view Images via 3D-to-2D Queriescited by 658
  6. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
  7. 2022BEVDepth: Acquisition of Reliable Depth for Multi-view 3D Object Detectioncited by 572
  8. 2022PETR: Position Embedding Transformation for Multi-View 3D Object Detectioncited by 552
  9. 2022TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformerscited by 466
  10. 2021FCOS3D: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 447
  11. 2021Conditional DETR for Fast Training Convergencecited by 424
  12. 2019Class-balanced Grouping and Sampling for Point Cloud 3D Object Detectioncited by 350
  13. 2022BEVFusion: A Simple and Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion Frameworkcited by 336
  14. 2023Exploring Object-Centric Temporal Modeling for Efficient Multi-View 3D Object Detectioncited by 315
  15. 2017Submanifold Sparse Convolutional Networkscited by 223
  16. 2023VoxelNeXt: Fully Sparse VoxelNet for 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 222
  17. 2022Unifying Voxel-based Representation with Transformer for 3D Object Detectioncited by 202
  18. 2022FUTR3D: A Unified Sensor Fusion Framework for 3D Detectioncited by 194
  19. 2020FCOS: A simple and strong anchor-free object detectorcited by 171
  20. 2021Multimodal Virtual Point 3D Detectioncited by 166
  21. 2022Focal Sparse Convolutional Networks for 3D Object Detectioncited by 142
  22. 2022DeepInteraction: 3D Object Detection via Modality Interactioncited by 125
  23. 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 114
  24. 2021Sparse DETR: Efficient End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Sparsitycited by 98
  25. 2021FusionPainting: Multimodal Fusion with Adaptive Attention for 3D Object Detectioncited by 92
  26. 2022Fully Sparse 3D Object Detectioncited by 84
  27. 2023SparseFusion: Fusing Multi-Modal Sparse Representations for Multi-Sensor 3D Object Detectioncited by 83
  28. 2023Cross Modal Transformer: Towards Fast and Robust 3D Object Detectioncited by 70
  29. 2023Far3D: Expanding the Horizon for Surround-view 3D Object Detectioncited by 70
  30. 2024IS-Fusion: Instance-Scene Collaborative Fusion for Multimodal 3D Object Detectioncited by 57
  31. 2022AutoAlignV2: Deformable Feature Aggregation for Dynamic Multi-Modal 3D Object Detectioncited by 46
  32. 2023Fully Sparse Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 29
  33. 2022Focal-PETR: Embracing Foreground for Efficient Multi-Camera 3D Object Detectioncited by 19
  34. 2022Multi-modal Fusion Technology based on Vehicle Information: A Surveycited by 13
  35. 2025MMTL-UniAD: A Unified Framework for Multimodal and Multi-Task Learning in Assistive Driving Perceptioncited by 10
  36. 2023Path Planning for Air-Ground Robot Considering Modal Switching Point Optimizationcited by 5
  37. 2024MIPD: A Multi-sensory Interactive Perception Dataset for Embodied Intelligent Drivingcited by 5
  38. 2024PoIFusion: Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection via Fusion at Points of Interestcited by 4

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.