Online Correlation Clustering: Simultaneously Optimizing All ℓp-norms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ℓp-norm objectives for correlation clustering present a fundamental trade-off between minimizing total disagreements (the ℓ1-norm) and ensuring fairness to individual nodes (the ℓ_∞-norm). Surprisingly, in the offline setting it is possible to simultaneously approximate all ℓp-norms with a single clustering. Can this powerful guarantee be achieved in an online setting? This paper provides the first affirmative answer. We present a single algorithm for the online-with-a-sample (AOS) model that, given a small constant fraction of the input as a sample, produces one clustering that is simultaneously O(log4 n)-competitive for all ℓp-norms with high probability, O(log n)-competitive for the ℓ_∞-norm with high probability, and O(1)-competitive for the ℓ1-norm in expectation. This work successfully translates the offline "all-norms" guarantee to the online world. Our setting is motivated by a new hardness result that demonstrates a fundamental separation between these objectives in the standard random-order (RO) online model. Namely, while the ℓ1-norm is trivially O(1)-approximable in the RO model, we prove that any algorithm in the RO model for the fairness-promoting ℓ_∞-norm must have a competitive ratio of at least Omega(n1/3). This highlights the necessity of a different beyond-worst-case model. We complement our algorithm with lower bounds, showing our competitive ratios for the ℓ1- and ℓ_∞- norms are nearly tight in the AOS model.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.
Builds on
24 of 41 references.
References · 24
- 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
- 2019Fair Algorithms for Clusteringcited by 98
- 2019Scalable Fair Clusteringcited by 78
- 2014Near Optimal LP Rounding Algorithm for Correlation Clustering on Complete and Complete k-partite Graphscited by 27
- 2020Fair Correlation Clusteringcited by 27
- 2022Correlation Clustering with Sherali-Adamscited by 15
- 2018Semi-Online Bipartite Matchingcited by 12
- 2018Approximation Algorithms for Minimum Norm and Ordered Optimization Problemscited by 11
- 2015Correlation Clustering and Biclustering with Locally Bounded Errorscited by 9
- 2019Competitive Analysis with a Sample and the Secretary Problemcited by 9
- 2022Which Lp norm is the fairest? Approximations for fair facility location across all "p"cited by 9
- 2017Local Guarantees in Graph Cuts and Clusteringcited by 8
12 more
- 2020Consistent k-Median: Simpler, Better and Robustcited by 7
- 2020Consistent k-Clustering for General Metricscited by 7
- 2023Fast Combinatorial Algorithms for Min Max Correlation Clusteringcited by 7
- 2014Correlation Clustering with Constrained Cluster Sizes and Extended Weights Boundscited by 6
- 2021Online Weighted Matching with a Samplecited by 6
- 2024Understanding the Cluster LP for Correlation Clusteringcited by 6
- 2023A 4-approximation algorithm for min max correlation clusteringcited by 4
- 2023Balancing Notions of Equity: Trade-offs Between Fair Portfolio Sizes and Achievable Guaranteescited by 4
- 2023Set Covering with Our Eyes Wide Shutcited by 2
- 2024Simultaneously Approximating All Norms for Massively Parallel Correlation Clusteringcited by 2
- 2025Min-Max Correlation Clustering via Neighborhood Similaritycited by 2
- 2020Improved Bounds for Distributed Load Balancingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.