mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Online Correlation Clustering: Simultaneously Optimizing All ℓp-norms

arXiv 2510.15076 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.DM cs.DScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ℓp-norm objectives for correlation clustering present a fundamental trade-off between minimizing total disagreements (the ℓ1-norm) and ensuring fairness to individual nodes (the ℓ_∞-norm). Surprisingly, in the offline setting it is possible to simultaneously approximate all ℓp-norms with a single clustering. Can this powerful guarantee be achieved in an online setting? This paper provides the first affirmative answer. We present a single algorithm for the online-with-a-sample (AOS) model that, given a small constant fraction of the input as a sample, produces one clustering that is simultaneously O(log4 n)-competitive for all ℓp-norms with high probability, O(log n)-competitive for the ℓ_∞-norm with high probability, and O(1)-competitive for the ℓ1-norm in expectation. This work successfully translates the offline "all-norms" guarantee to the online world. Our setting is motivated by a new hardness result that demonstrates a fundamental separation between these objectives in the standard random-order (RO) online model. Namely, while the ℓ1-norm is trivially O(1)-approximable in the RO model, we prove that any algorithm in the RO model for the fairness-promoting ℓ_∞-norm must have a competitive ratio of at least Omega(n1/3). This highlights the necessity of a different beyond-worst-case model. We complement our algorithm with lower bounds, showing our competitive ratios for the ℓ1- and ℓ_∞- norms are nearly tight in the AOS model.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.

Builds on

24 of 41 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
  2. 2019Fair Algorithms for Clusteringcited by 98
  3. 2019Scalable Fair Clusteringcited by 78
  4. 2014Near Optimal LP Rounding Algorithm for Correlation Clustering on Complete and Complete k-partite Graphscited by 27
  5. 2020Fair Correlation Clusteringcited by 27
  6. 2022Correlation Clustering with Sherali-Adamscited by 15
  7. 2018Semi-Online Bipartite Matchingcited by 12
  8. 2018Approximation Algorithms for Minimum Norm and Ordered Optimization Problemscited by 11
  9. 2015Correlation Clustering and Biclustering with Locally Bounded Errorscited by 9
  10. 2019Competitive Analysis with a Sample and the Secretary Problemcited by 9
  11. 2022Which Lp norm is the fairest? Approximations for fair facility location across all "p"cited by 9
  12. 2017Local Guarantees in Graph Cuts and Clusteringcited by 8
12 more
  1. 2020Consistent k-Median: Simpler, Better and Robustcited by 7
  2. 2020Consistent k-Clustering for General Metricscited by 7
  3. 2023Fast Combinatorial Algorithms for Min Max Correlation Clusteringcited by 7
  4. 2014Correlation Clustering with Constrained Cluster Sizes and Extended Weights Boundscited by 6
  5. 2021Online Weighted Matching with a Samplecited by 6
  6. 2024Understanding the Cluster LP for Correlation Clusteringcited by 6
  7. 2023A 4-approximation algorithm for min max correlation clusteringcited by 4
  8. 2023Balancing Notions of Equity: Trade-offs Between Fair Portfolio Sizes and Achievable Guaranteescited by 4
  9. 2023Set Covering with Our Eyes Wide Shutcited by 2
  10. 2024Simultaneously Approximating All Norms for Massively Parallel Correlation Clusteringcited by 2
  11. 2025Min-Max Correlation Clustering via Neighborhood Similaritycited by 2
  12. 2020Improved Bounds for Distributed Load Balancingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.