The Tree-SNE Tree Exists
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The clustering and visualisation of high-dimensional data is a ubiquitous task in modern data science. Popular techniques include nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods like t-SNE or UMAP. These methods face the `scale-problem' of clustering: when dealing with the MNIST dataset, do we want to distinguish different digits or do we want to distinguish different ways of writing the digits? The answer is task dependent and depends on scale. We revisit an idea of Robinson & Pierce-Hoffman that exploits an underlying scaling symmetry in t-SNE to replace 2-dimensional with (2+1)-dimensional embeddings where the additional parameter accounts for scale. This gives rise to the t-SNE tree (short: tree-SNE). We prove that the optimal embedding depends continuously on the scaling parameter for all initial conditions outside a set of measure 0: the tree-SNE tree exists. This idea conceivably extends to other attraction-repulsion methods and is illustrated on several examples.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.
Builds on
9 of 18 references.
References · 9
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2017Efficient Algorithms for t-distributed Stochastic Neighborhood Embeddingcited by 75
- 2017Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithmscited by 60
- 2021Theoretical Foundations of t-SNE for Visualizing High-Dimensional Clustered Datacited by 55
- 2017Clustering with t-SNE, provablycited by 51
- 2018An Analysis of the t-SNE Algorithm for Data Visualizationcited by 49
- 2020Attraction-Repulsion Spectrum in Neighbor Embeddingscited by 41
- 2019Heavy-tailed kernels reveal a finer cluster structure in t-SNE visualisationscited by 22
- 2020Tree-SNE: Hierarchical Clustering and Visualization Using t-SNEcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.