You May Speak Freely: Improving the Fine-Grained Visual Recognition Capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models with Answer Extraction
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the renewed interest in zero-shot visual classification due to the rise of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), the problem of evaluating free-form responses of auto-regressive models remains a persistent challenge. Most existing works focus on language-only tasks or don't consider Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) beyond 5-way options, both of which are critical capabilities to solve tasks in Fine-Grained Visual Classification (FGVC) where choice counts are in the hundreds to thousands and the choices are highly related. Furthermore, in this highly multi-way MCQ setting it is not clear how to extend LLM choice extraction to retrieval-based problems, where computing probabilities over the choice set is computationally costly. In this work we investigate nlg2choice, a simple two-stage method which first asks the MLLM an open-ended question for the task with minimal constraints, then uses text-only constrained decoding to predict the most likely choice. In retrieval settings, we compute the probability of the constrained response taking that choice with an early stopping method to significantly improve throughput. Our results show improvement over a suite of seven fine-grained visual datasets when evaluating in terms of classification and retrieval, and show that this performance holds over the various ways that users of LLMs can implement tasks in natural language.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 31 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.
Builds on
31 of 50 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 30
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
18 more
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 773
- 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 606
- 2022Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answeringcited by 203
- 2023Efficient Guided Generation for Large Language Modelscited by 200
- 2024Guiding LLMs The Right Way: Fast, Non-Invasive Constrained Generationcited by 101
- 2024Let Me Speak Freely? A Study on the Impact of Format Restrictions on Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 96
- 2024XGrammar: Flexible and Efficient Structured Generation Engine for Large Language Modelscited by 75
- 2024"My Answer is C": First-Token Probabilities Do Not Match Text Answers in Instruction-Tuned Language Modelscited by 69
- 2025xVerify: Efficient Answer Verifier for Reasoning Model Evaluationscited by 55
- 2024"We Need Structured Output": Towards User-centered Constraints on Large Language Model Outputcited by 46
- 2025Right Answer, Wrong Score: Uncovering the Inconsistencies of LLM Evaluation in Multiple-Choice Question Answeringcited by 28
- 2024Beyond Probabilities: Unveiling the Misalignment in Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2025SLOT: Structuring the Output of Large Language Modelscited by 18
- 2024Look at the Text: Instruction-Tuned Language Models are More Robust Multiple Choice Selectors than You Thinkcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Detect, Describe, Discriminate: Moving Beyond VQA for MLLM Evaluation
- 2025Coling-UniA at SciVQA 2025: Few-Shot Example Retrieval and Confidence-Informed Ensembling for Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Benchmarking and Mitigating MCQA Selection Bias of Large Vision-Language Models
- 2024DARE: Diverse Visual Question Answering with Robustness Evaluation
- 2025Analyzing and Boosting the Power of Fine-Grained Visual Recognition for Multi-modal Large Language Models
- 2026Look Where It Counts: A Free, Label-Free Visual Evidence Signal for Fine-Grained Vision-Language Reasoning
- 2025Zero-Shot Fine-Grained Image Classification Using Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026Understanding the Fine-Grained Knowledge Capabilities of Vision-Language Models