Beyond the Sampled Token: Preserving Candidate Support in RLVR
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We revisit exploration collapse in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), from the perspective of the candidate distribution for next-token prediction. We formally show that as probability concentrates on the top-1 candidate, the expected number of distinct responses collapses to one regardless of the sampling budget K. This theoretical implication is further verified by our empirical tracking of top-N candidate probabilities during training, where the top-1 candidate progressively dominates while plausible alternatives are suppressed. These findings suggest a key desideratum for effective exploration: preserving non-negligible probability mass on the top-N candidates. To this end, we propose Candidate-aware Support Preservation (CaSP), with two complementary designs. Specifically, CaSP redistributes positive gradients among top-N candidates for correct responses, and applies a stronger penalty to the top-1 candidate for incorrect responses. Unlike many exploration-oriented methods that improve pass@K at the cost of pass@1, CaSP improves pass@K across the full K spectrum. These gains generalize to 6 math, 2 logical-reasoning, and 2 coding benchmarks, and scales to 32B-parameter models and sampling budgets up to K=1024, positioning it as a principled, candidate-level approach for RLVR exploration.
Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.
Builds on
30 of 46 references.
References · 30
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 655
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 505
18 more
- 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 450
- 2025Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspectivecited by 277
- 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positivecited by 239
- 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
- 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoningcited by 158
- 2025Pass@K Policy Optimization: Solving Harder Reinforcement Learning Problemscited by 83
- 2025Jointly Reinforcing Diversity and Quality in Language Model Generationscited by 79
- 2025Outcome-based Exploration for LLM Reasoningcited by 79
- 2025T1: Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference Scalingcited by 77
- 2025Beyond Pass@1: Self-Play with Variational Problem Synthesis Sustains RLVRcited by 53
- 2025Do Not Let Low-Probability Tokens Over-Dominate in RL for LLMscited by 43
- 2025Depth-Breadth Synergy in RLVR: Unlocking LLM Reasoning Gains with Adaptive Explorationcited by 40
- 2025QuestA: Expanding Reasoning Capacity in LLMs via Question Augmentationcited by 39
- 2025On the Effect of Negative Gradient in Group Relative Deep Reinforcement Optimizationcited by 31
- 2024What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Reasoning?cited by 22
- 2018On the Learning Dynamics of Deep Neural Networkscited by 18
- 2025Random Policy Valuation is Enough for LLM Reasoning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 10
- 2025RSPO: Risk-Seeking Policy Optimization for Pass@k and Max@k Metrics in Large Language Modelscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 16.
18 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025SofT-GRPO: Surpassing Discrete-Token LLM Reinforcement Learning via Gumbel-Reparameterized Soft-Thinking Policy Optimizationcited by 18
- 2025Pass@k Metric for RLVR: A Diagnostic Tool of Exploration, But Not an Objectivecited by 11
- 2026VISD: Enhancing Video Reasoning via Structured Self-Distillationcited by 9
- 2026PAPO: Stabilizing Rubric Integration Training via Decoupled Advantage Normalizationcited by 8
- 2026Frontis-MA1: Training an AI4AI Model towards Recursive Self-Improvement in Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 7
- 2026Why Pass@k Optimization Can Degrade Pass@1: Prompt Interference in LLM Post-trainingcited by 6
- 2026ResRL: Boosting LLM Reasoning via Negative Sample Projection Residual Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2026Calibration-Aware Policy Optimization for Reasoning LLMscited by 4
- 2026Reasoning over mathematical objects: on-policy reward modeling and test time aggregationcited by 3
- 2026From P(y|x) to P(y): Investigating Reinforcement Learning in Pre-train Spacecited by 3
- 2026On Advantage Estimates for Max@K Policy Gradientscited by 2
- 2026Boosting LLM Reasoning via Human-Inspired Reward Shapingcited by 1
6 more
- 2026Asymmetric Advantage Modulation Calibrates Entropy Dynamics in RLVRcited by 1
- 2026Beyond the Mean: Multi-Moment Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026When Correct Solutions Repeat: Rarity-Aware Credit Redistribution for GRPOcited by 0
- 2026Video-HopChain: Multi-Hop Questions and Confidence-Gated Exploration for Video Reasoning Modelscited by 0
- 2026Strategically Diverse Sampling for Self-Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Learning Dynamics of Continual Learning: A Unified View of Data Attribution, Forgetting, and Plasticity Losscited by 0
- 2026Learning Dynamics of Continual Learning: A Unified View of Data Attribution, Forgetting, and Plasticity Loss27 Sep 2026
- 2026Strategically Diverse Sampling for Self-Training25 Sep 2026
- 2026Video-HopChain: Multi-Hop Questions and Confidence-Gated Exploration for Video Reasoning Models22 Sep 2026
- 2026When Correct Solutions Repeat: Rarity-Aware Credit Redistribution for GRPO4 Aug 2026
- 2026Beyond the Mean: Multi-Moment Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning3 Aug 2026
- 2026Frontis-MA1: Training an AI4AI Model towards Recursive Self-Improvement in Machine Learning Engineering30 Jul 2026
- 2026On Advantage Estimates for Max@K Policy Gradients4 Jun 2026
- 2026VISD: Enhancing Video Reasoning via Structured Self-Distillation7 May 2026
- 2026ResRL: Boosting LLM Reasoning via Negative Sample Projection Residual Reinforcement Learning1 May 2026
- 2026From P(y|x) to P(y): Investigating Reinforcement Learning in Pre-train Space15 Apr 2026
- 2026Calibration-Aware Policy Optimization for Reasoning LLMs14 Apr 2026
- 2026Asymmetric Advantage Modulation Calibrates Entropy Dynamics in RLVR6 Apr 2026
6 more
- 2026PAPO: Stabilizing Rubric Integration Training via Decoupled Advantage Normalization27 Mar 2026
- 2026Reasoning over mathematical objects: on-policy reward modeling and test time aggregation19 Mar 2026
- 2026Why Pass@k Optimization Can Degrade Pass@1: Prompt Interference in LLM Post-training24 Feb 2026
- 2026Boosting LLM Reasoning via Human-Inspired Reward Shaping4 Feb 2026
- 2025Pass@k Metric for RLVR: A Diagnostic Tool of Exploration, But Not an Objective20 Nov 2025
- 2025SofT-GRPO: Surpassing Discrete-Token LLM Reinforcement Learning via Gumbel-Reparameterized Soft-Thinking Policy Optimization9 Nov 2025
- 2025SofT-GRPO: Surpassing Discrete-Token LLM Reinforcement Learning via Gumbel-Reparameterized Soft-Thinking Policy Optimizationcited by 18
- 2025Pass@k Metric for RLVR: A Diagnostic Tool of Exploration, But Not an Objectivecited by 11
- 2026VISD: Enhancing Video Reasoning via Structured Self-Distillationcited by 9
- 2026PAPO: Stabilizing Rubric Integration Training via Decoupled Advantage Normalizationcited by 8
- 2026Why Pass@k Optimization Can Degrade Pass@1: Prompt Interference in LLM Post-trainingcited by 6
- 2026ResRL: Boosting LLM Reasoning via Negative Sample Projection Residual Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2026Calibration-Aware Policy Optimization for Reasoning LLMscited by 4
- 2026Reasoning over mathematical objects: on-policy reward modeling and test time aggregationcited by 3
- 2026From P(y|x) to P(y): Investigating Reinforcement Learning in Pre-train Spacecited by 3
- 2026On Advantage Estimates for Max@K Policy Gradientscited by 2
- 2026Boosting LLM Reasoning via Human-Inspired Reward Shapingcited by 1
- 2026Asymmetric Advantage Modulation Calibrates Entropy Dynamics in RLVRcited by 1
12 most cited of 16 All 16 (JSON)
- 2026Strategically Diverse Sampling for Self-Training25 Sep 2026
- 2026Video-HopChain: Multi-Hop Questions and Confidence-Gated Exploration for Video Reasoning Models22 Sep 2026
- 2026When Correct Solutions Repeat: Rarity-Aware Credit Redistribution for GRPO4 Aug 2026
- 2026Beyond the Mean: Multi-Moment Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning3 Aug 2026
- 2026On Advantage Estimates for Max@K Policy Gradients4 Jun 2026
- 2026VISD: Enhancing Video Reasoning via Structured Self-Distillation7 May 2026
- 2026ResRL: Boosting LLM Reasoning via Negative Sample Projection Residual Reinforcement Learning1 May 2026
- 2026From P(y|x) to P(y): Investigating Reinforcement Learning in Pre-train Space15 Apr 2026
- 2026Calibration-Aware Policy Optimization for Reasoning LLMs14 Apr 2026
- 2026Asymmetric Advantage Modulation Calibrates Entropy Dynamics in RLVR6 Apr 2026
- 2026PAPO: Stabilizing Rubric Integration Training via Decoupled Advantage Normalization27 Mar 2026
- 2026Reasoning over mathematical objects: on-policy reward modeling and test time aggregation19 Mar 2026
12 newest of 16 All 16 (JSON)