mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Camera Movement Classification in Historical Footage: A Comparative Study of Deep Video Models

arXiv 2510.14713 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.AI eess.IVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Camera movement conveys spatial and narrative information essential for understanding video content. While recent camera movement classification (CMC) methods perform well on modern datasets, their generalization to historical footage remains unexplored. This paper presents the first systematic evaluation of deep video CMC models on archival film material. We summarize representative methods and datasets, highlighting differences in model design and label definitions. Five standard video classification models are assessed on the HISTORIAN dataset, which includes expert-annotated World War II footage. The best-performing model, Video Swin Transformer, achieves 80.25% accuracy, showing strong convergence despite limited training data. Our findings highlight the challenges and potential of adapting existing models to low-quality video and motivate future work combining diverse input modalities and temporal architectures.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.

Builds on

5 of 16 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  2. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,139
  3. 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,090
  4. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 899
  5. 2020A Unified Framework for Shot Type Classification Based on Subject Centric Lenscited by 44

Built on by

Not cited yet.